---
title: "Enphase vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Enphase vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Enphase vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Enphase | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | USA | China |
| Headquarters | Fremont, California | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Employees | 2000-3000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: ENPH |  |
| Website | [https://www.enphase.com](https://www.enphase.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Enphase Energy is an American energy technology company. Founded in 2006, Enphase develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Their microinverter technology has transformed the solar industry by converting sunlight into a safe...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Enphase | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Enphase | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Enphase | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Enphase | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Enphase | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Enphase | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Enphase Energy, founded in 2006 and headquartered in Fremont, California, is primarily a microinverter and energy technology company rather than a solar module manufacturer. It does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 solar panel lists, which apply exclusively to module makers, but it holds a dominant position in the global residential inverter market, having shipped over 48 million microinverters as of 2025. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, and has grown into one of the top three global module producers, with annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative shipments surpassing 292 GW by mid-2025. Trina holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for the eighth consecutive time, achieving a 100% bankability score in 2025, which makes it one of the most financeable module brands available to project developers worldwide. In terms of institutional footprint as a module manufacturer, Trina Solar has no peer in this comparison.

Trina Solar's product lineup is anchored by the Vertex series, built on large-format 210 mm wafers and N-type i-TOPCon cell technology, with flagship models reaching efficiencies up to 23.2% and power output exceeding 700 W per panel. The Vertex S line addresses residential rooftops with limited space, while the Vertex N and higher-wattage variants serve commercial and industrial rooftops as well as utility-scale ground-mount projects in over 100 countries. Flagship products carry a 30-year performance warranty, which is above the industry norm. Enphase, by contrast, offers residential-focused energy systems built around its IQ series microinverters, paired with IQ Battery storage and a whole-home energy management platform. Importantly, Enphase microinverters are compatible with panels from virtually any manufacturer, including Trina Solar, meaning the two brands are frequently deployed together rather than as alternatives.

For a buyer selecting solar panels, Trina Solar is the default recommendation - it is a proven, bankable manufacturer with global scale, advanced cell technology, and broad eligibility for third-party project financing. Enphase is the relevant choice when the decision concerns inverter technology, particularly for residential installations that prioritize per-panel monitoring, shade resilience, or integrated battery storage. Rather than treating these two as rivals, the more accurate framing is that a well-optimized system can - and often does - combine Trina Solar modules with Enphase microinverters.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Enphase vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Enphase vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Enphase vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-trina-solar