---
title: "Enphase vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Enphase vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-hyundai"
---

# Enphase vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Enphase | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | USA | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Fremont, California | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2006 | 2004 |
| Employees | 2000-3000 | 206 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: ENPH | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.enphase.com](https://www.enphase.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

Enphase Energy is an American energy technology company. Founded in 2006, Enphase develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Their microinverter technology has transformed the solar industry by converting sunlight into a safe...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Enphase | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 65 | +65 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 640 W | +640 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 442 W | +442 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Enphase | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.40% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.49% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Enphase | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Enphase | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Enphase | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Enphase | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information from both searches, and it's clear these two brands aren't directly comparable products (Enphase makes microinverters/energy electronics, Hyundai makes solar modules), which the comparison should note explicitly.

Enphase is a US company headquartered in Fremont, California, founded in 2006 by Raghu Belur and Martin Fornage to commercialize microinverter technology. Rather than manufacturing solar panels themselves, Enphase specializes in module-level power electronics and home energy systems, including IQ microinverters, battery storage, the Envoy communication gateway, and the Enlighten monitoring platform. The company went public in 2012 and today has a market capitalization in the region of 4.7 to 5 billion dollars, giving it a strong publicly traded profile in the US residential solar electronics market. Hyundai, through its subsidiary HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seongnam-si, with roots in the solar business going back to 2004 and independent corporate status since 2016. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions appears on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankable module maker list and reports around 1.4 GW of annual production capacity. Institutionally, Hyundai benefits from backing by the larger HD Hyundai industrial group, while Enphase's footprint comes from its public listing and dominant position in the US microinverter niche.

Because these two companies occupy different segments of the solar value chain, they are not strict competitors. Hyundai's product lineup centers on physical PV modules, including monofacial, bifacial, and shingled panels using N-type TOPCon and related cell technology, with reported efficiencies around 20.5 to 21.5 percent and warranties commonly spanning 25 to 30 years; these modules serve residential and commercial rooftops as well as ground-mount and floating solar projects. Enphase does not sell panels at all; its IQ microinverters, batteries, and monitoring software are typically paired with a separate panel brand, most often in premium residential rooftop installations in North America, Europe, and increasingly Japan, where per-panel power optimization and outage-resilient battery backup are valued.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice is not really "Enphase versus Hyundai" but rather whether to pair Hyundai's Tier 1 panels with Enphase's microinverter and storage ecosystem, a combination many US installers already offer. If a straightforward panel-brand comparison is needed, Hyundai stands on its own bankability and manufacturing credentials, while Enphase's value lies in the electronics and software layer around whichever panels are chosen.

\---LINKS---

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Maker Methodology \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025 \| review

\- https://news.energysage.com/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Hyundai Solar Panels: The Complete Review \| EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.vpsolar.com/en/hyundai-tier-1-pv-modules/ \| Hyundai: Tier 1 PV modules overview \| article

\- https://shopsolarkits.com/blogs/learning-center/get-to-know-enphase \| Get to Know Your Top Solar Brands: Enphase \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Enphase vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [Enphase vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [Enphase vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/enphase-vs-hyundai