---
title: "Energetik vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Energetik vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/energetik-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Energetik vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Energetik | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Gütersloh | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.powershop.online](https://www.powershop.online) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Energetik Solartechnologie Vertrieb GmbH is a German B2B wholesaler and distributor of photovoltaic equipment, including solar panels, inverters, and battery storage systems. The company operates under the brand powershop.online and partners with leading manufacturers such as Meyer Burger, Trina Solar, SMA, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Energetik | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Energetik | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Energetik | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Energetik | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Energetik | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Energetik | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Energetik is a brand for which no publicly verifiable institutional data - founding year, country of headquarters, annual production capacity, or Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status - could be confirmed through available industry sources at the time of writing. It should therefore be treated as a niche or regionally distributed label rather than a globally tracked manufacturer. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, and has grown into one of the top three global solar manufacturers by shipment volume. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and surpassed 225 GW in cumulative module shipments by early 2025, with annual shipments of approximately 77 GW recorded in 2024. Operating in over 100 countries and employing roughly 30,000 people worldwide, Trina Solar carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint than Energetik.

Trina Solar addresses the full range of solar deployment scenarios through two flagship product families. The Vertex series, centred on large-format 210 mm wafers, targets utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects where high module output and reduced balance-of-system cost are the primary drivers. The Vertex S+ line, offering N-type i-TOPCon dual-glass modules spanning 425 to 505 Wp with efficiencies reaching up to 22.8%, is positioned for residential rooftops and commercial and industrial rooftop applications alike. Both families carry TUV Rheinland certification, and the 210 mm module series holds what Trina Solar claims as an industry-first TUV Rheinland lifecycle assessment certificate. Energetik's product portfolio, cell technology, and intended use cases remain unverifiable through publicly available trade sources, making any direct product-level comparison speculative.

For a typical buyer - residential homeowner, commercial developer, or utility project manager - Trina Solar offers a well-documented performance track record, global supply chain resilience, manufacturer warranty backed by a large corporate balance sheet, and confirmed Tier 1 bankability that satisfies lender and insurer requirements in most markets. Energetik cannot be meaningfully assessed on these dimensions without verifiable public data. Until the brand establishes a traceable industry record, buyers and project financiers should treat it as an unrated option and commission independent technical due diligence before specifying it on any project where bankability is a contractual requirement.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Energetik vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/energetik-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Energetik vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/energetik-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Energetik vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/energetik-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/energetik-vs-trina-solar