---
title: "ENCOR vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare ENCOR vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/encor-vs-trina-solar"
---

# ENCOR vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 4 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | ENCOR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | China |
| Headquarters | Olsztyn | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1991 | 1997 |
| Employees | 200-500 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://corab.eu/encor](https://corab.eu/encor) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

ENCOR is a proprietary solar brand owned by CORAB S.A., a Polish manufacturer and distributor of photovoltaic systems founded in 1991. The brand covers an ecosystem of own-label PV modules, inverters, and energy storage units produced to CORAB's specifications. CORAB is one of the largest photovoltaic mounting...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | ENCOR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 4 | 340 | +336 |
| Max Power | 460 W | 760 W | +300 W |
| Avg Power | 411 W | 520 W | +109 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | ENCOR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.30% | 24.80% | +3.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.88% | 21.71% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | ENCOR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.344%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.042 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | ENCOR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (50.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 2 (50.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | ENCOR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (50.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 2 (50.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | ENCOR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 3 (75.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 1 (25.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, ENCOR


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EC460M-10-120S](https://comparepv.com/panel/encor-ec460m-10-120s) | 460 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EC415M-10-108B-V](https://comparepv.com/panel/encor-ec415m-10-108b-v) | 415 | 21.2 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EC395M-10-108FB](https://comparepv.com/panel/encor-ec395m-10-108fb) | 395 | 20.4 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EC375M-6-120B](https://comparepv.com/panel/encor-ec375m-6-120b) | 375 | 20.6 | -0.365 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

ENCOR is a photovoltaic module brand owned by Corab S.A., a Polish company with over 30 years of industry experience and one of the largest domestic suppliers of PV mounting systems and balance-of-system components in Central Europe. ENCOR modules are not manufactured in Poland - they are produced to Corab's specification at a Tier 1-certified OEM facility, which means the manufacturing site meets the financial bankability benchmarks used by project lenders, though the ENCOR brand itself does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list. Corab backs the product with a 12-year product warranty and a 25-year linear performance guarantee handled through its own Polish distribution network. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 1997, and a consistent presence on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list alongside LONGi, JinkoSolar, and JA Solar. The company's annual production capacity exceeds 100 GW, and cumulative global module shipments surpassed 225 GW by early 2025. In terms of institutional footprint and lender bankability, Trina Solar operates on a substantially different scale.

ENCOR's lineup centers on monocrystalline half-cut modules in standard, full-black, and bifacial configurations, covering power ratings from roughly 375 W to over 500 W. The brand is purpose-built for the Polish market, addressing residential prosumer rooftops, mid-size commercial installations, and smaller ground-mount projects, with the practical advantage of local technical assistance and warranty claims handled domestically. Trina Solar's Vertex family spans a much broader spectrum: the Vertex S series targets residential and small commercial buyers, while the Vertex N series, built on n-type i-TOPCon cell technology, delivers confirmed efficiencies above 24% and module output exceeding 700 W in mass production, making it a primary option for large-scale commercial and utility ground-mount projects. Trina operates in over 160 countries, offering supply chain continuity and regional support at a global level.

For buyers who prioritize a domestically underwritten warranty, local-language support, and an established regional supply chain, ENCOR through Corab is a well-positioned premium-value choice. For large commercial or utility-scale projects where lender bankability and long-term manufacturer viability are decisive criteria, Trina Solar is the stronger default. At the residential prosumer level the two brands are broadly interchangeable in terms of delivered energy output, with the key differentiator being the geographic reach and financial depth of the guarantee behind each name.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [ENCOR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/encor-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [ENCOR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/encor-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [ENCOR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/encor-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/encor-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.