---
title: "Emona Connect vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emona Connect vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Emona Connect vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emona Connect | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | France | China |
| Headquarters | Biarritz | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.emona-connect.com](https://www.emona-connect.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Emona Connect is a French company that specializes in providing solutions to replace old solar PV panels with similar ones. They operate in the niche segment of supplying custom-made PV modules for replacement or spare stocks. The company supports solar asset managers, O&M companies, and plant operators, offering...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emona Connect | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emona Connect | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emona Connect | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emona Connect | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Emona Connect | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Emona Connect | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Emona Connect is a French company founded to address a specific gap in the solar aftermarket: supplying custom-made replacement PV modules for aging installations whose original panels are no longer manufactured. Its customers are primarily European solar asset managers, O&M firms, and operators of legacy photovoltaic fleets seeking dimensionally compatible substitutes. Emona Connect does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists and has no publicly disclosed annual production volume measured in gigawatts - the company operates at a much smaller, project-specific scale. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the largest photovoltaic manufacturers in the world, headquartered in Changzhou, China, and founded in 1997. It has held continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and shipped more than 292 GW of modules cumulatively to customers in over 100 countries; in 2024 alone, shipments reached approximately 77 GW, placing Trina among the top three module suppliers globally alongside JinkoSolar and LONGi. On every institutional metric - bankability, manufacturing scale, and geographic reach - Trina Solar occupies an entirely different category from Emona Connect.

Emona Connect's portfolio centres on custom crystalline silicon modules - mono- and polycrystalline, framed or frameless, with full-black variants available - engineered to match the physical dimensions and electrical parameters of discontinued panels. Output ratings documented in publicly available datasheets range from roughly 215 W to 340 W, reflecting older-generation form factors. The company does not publicly position its products around TOPCon, HJT, or other advanced cell architectures; its core value proposition is operational continuity and dimensional compatibility rather than peak efficiency. Trina Solar offers a broad tiered product family under the Vertex brand. The Vertex S and Vertex S+ lines serve residential rooftop and small commercial installations, while the high-wattage Vertex N series - built on TOPCon and the newer i-TOPCon Ultra platform - targets utility-scale ground-mount and large C&I projects. Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra modules have entered mass production at outputs up to 760 W, a module efficiency of 24.5%, and a bifaciality factor of 90%, making them competitive in international ground-mount tenders and export markets alike.

For a mainstream buyer - a residential homeowner, a commercial developer, or a utility procuring at scale - Trina Solar is the natural default, supported by Tier 1 bankability, an established global installer network, and a modern TOPCon product line suited to any project type. Emona Connect is not a mainstream competitor: it is a specialist aftermarket supplier whose relevance is confined to repowering or partial replacement of existing PV assets where dimensional matching takes priority over efficiency gains. The two brands are not interchangeable, and the choice between them is straightforward - new installations call for Trina Solar, while legacy systems requiring like-for-like module substitution are precisely the scenario Emona Connect was built for.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emona Connect vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Emona Connect vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Emona Connect vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-trina-solar