---
title: "Emona Connect vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emona Connect vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-aiko"
---

# Emona Connect vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emona Connect | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | France | China |
| Headquarters | Biarritz | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.emona-connect.com](https://www.emona-connect.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

Emona Connect is a French company that specializes in providing solutions to replace old solar PV panels with similar ones. They operate in the niche segment of supplying custom-made PV modules for replacement or spare stocks. The company supports solar asset managers, O&M companies, and plant operators, offering...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emona Connect | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 144 | +144 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 805 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 581 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emona Connect | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 25.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 23.65% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emona Connect | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.271%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.5 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emona Connect | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Emona Connect | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Emona Connect | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Emona Connect is a French company positioned in the highly specialized niche of custom replacement photovoltaic modules for aging solar installations. Rather than competing on the mass market, it serves operations-and-maintenance firms, asset managers, and plant operators who need to swap out older panels - typically in the 180-330 Wp range - that are no longer in production and difficult to source through conventional channels. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing has been identified for Emona Connect, which reflects its boutique scale and narrow target market rather than any quality deficiency. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a vertically integrated manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, China, that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and operates multiple gigafactories across China with a reported production capacity of roughly 20 GW per year. In terms of institutional footprint and global bankability, AIKO holds a commanding lead.

The two companies address almost entirely different use cases. Emona Connect offers custom-dimensioned mono and polycrystalline panels certified to IEC 61215 and IEC 61730, with a 10-year product warranty and an 80%-output guarantee over 25 years - specifications tuned for curative maintenance rather than greenfield deployment. AIKO builds its product portfolio around All-Back-Contact cell technology, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to maximize light capture, and its Neostar series targets premium residential rooftops and commercial installations where high efficiency per square meter is a priority. AIKO has consistently topped Taiyangnews global module efficiency rankings since early 2023 and offers a 30-year performance warranty, which is notably more generous than industry norms.

For any buyer evaluating new solar installations in 2025 - residential, commercial, or small utility-scale - AIKO is the clear default choice, backed by bankability credentials, proven high-efficiency technology, and broad installer availability in key markets. Emona Connect is not a competitor in that space; it fills a genuine but narrow gap in the replacement-parts market, and for that specific requirement it remains a credible, IEC-certified option.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/emona-connect \| Emona Connect manufacturer profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.raylyst.eu/en/what-distinguishes-aiko-abc-technology-from-perc-topcon-or-hjt-panels/ \| What makes AIKO ABC technology stand out from PERC, TOPCon, HJT \| article

\- https://www.fmb.org.uk/homepicks/solar-panels/aiko-solar-panel-review/ \| AIKO Neostar 3P54 470W solar panels review - FMB \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emona Connect vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Emona Connect vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Emona Connect vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emona-connect-vs-aiko