---
title: "Emmvee vs Solar N Plus - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emmvee vs Solar N Plus solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-solar-n-plus"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/emmvee/solar-n-plus.png"
---

# Emmvee vs Solar N Plus

Emmvee has the broader catalog (166 vs 149 models). Emmvee leads on peak efficiency at 23.51%. Solar N Plus leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emmvee | Solar N Plus |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India |  |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru |  |
| Founded | 1992 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emmvee | Solar N Plus | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 166 | 149 | +17 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 720 W |  |
| Avg Power | 526 W | 506 W | +20 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emmvee | Solar N Plus | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 23.30% | +0.21 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 21.96% | +0.27 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emmvee | Solar N Plus | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 111 (74%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 29.7 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solar N Plus skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emmvee | Solar N Plus |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 21 (14.1%) |
| 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 42 (28.2%) |
| 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 70 (47.0%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 16 (10.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solar N Plus offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Emmvee | Solar N Plus |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 7 (4.7%) |
| 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 77 (51.7%) |
| 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 36 (24.2%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 19 (12.8%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 10 (6.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (56%)


| Technology | Emmvee | Solar N Plus |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 83 (55.7%) |
| PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 35 (23.5%) |
| N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 26 (17.4%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 5 (3.4%) |


## Top panels, Emmvee


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solar N Plus


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SP-N18/132HG-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SP-N18/132HG 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SP-N18/132HG-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SP-N18/132HG 715](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SP-N18/132HG-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SP-N18/132HG 710](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SP-N18/132HG-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SP-N18/132HG 705](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SP-N18/132HG-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SP-N18/132HG 700](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Emmvee is an Indian solar manufacturer headquartered in Bengaluru, founded in 1992 originally as a solar water heater business before pivoting into PV cell and module production. The company now runs roughly 10.3 GW of annual module capacity and about 2.9 GW of TOPCon cell capacity, with expansion plans targeting over 16 GW by 2028, and its modules reportedly passed all seven Kiwa PVEL 2024 Reliability Scorecard criteria, a notable quality benchmark rarely achieved by Indian manufacturers. Solar N Plus, by contrast, is a Chinese vertically integrated manufacturer headquartered in Chuzhou, focused on N-type cell technology, operating around 20 GW of combined annual cell and module capacity across facilities in China, Laos, and Indonesia, giving it a clear edge in raw industrial scale, though its track record on independent bankability and Tier 1 lists is less documented in the sources available.

Both companies build around TOPCon and N-type cell architectures, positioning their products for rooftop residential and commercial installations as well as utility-scale ground-mount projects. Emmvee additionally serves India's DCR (domestically content-required) segment and pursues EPC contracts in Europe, while Solar N Plus emphasizes the higher efficiency, lower temperature coefficient, and stronger LID/PID resistance typical of N-type cells, and has secured large export orders such as a single 500 MW overseas supply contract. For international buyers, this means Emmvee is often the more relevant choice for projects tied to the Indian or European supply chain, while Solar N Plus competes primarily on the sheer manufacturing scale characteristic of major Chinese suppliers.

In practical terms the two brands are technologically comparable, since both rely on next-generation N-type TOPCon cells, but Emmvee currently has a stronger, better-documented reliability record from independent testing, whereas Solar N Plus leads on production capacity. Absent a confirmed side-by-side BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing for both brands at this time, the better default depends on project context: buyers prioritizing verified quality data may lean toward Emmvee, while large-volume or export-driven procurement may favor Solar N Plus's scale.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solar N Plus](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solar-n-plus)
- [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solar N Plus](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solar-n-plus)
- [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solar N Plus](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solar-n-plus)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-solar-n-plus

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.