--- title: "Emmvee vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-seraphim" --- # Emmvee vs Seraphim Emmvee has the broader catalog (166 vs 160 models). Emmvee leads on peak efficiency at 23.51%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Emmvee | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | India | China | | Headquarters | Bengaluru | Changzhou | | Founded | 1992 | 2011 | | Employees | | 1001-5000 | | Annual capacity | | 13 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) | Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Emmvee | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 166 | 160 | +6 | | Max Power | 720 W | 730 W | +10 W | | Avg Power | 526 W | 549 W | +23 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Emmvee | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 23.50% | +0.01 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 21.82% | +0.13 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Emmvee | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.005 | | Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 111 (69%) | +15 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +1.7 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Emmvee | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 32 (20.0%) | | 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 58 (36.2%) | | 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 51 (31.9%) | | 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 19 (11.9%) | ## Power distribution Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup) | Power band | Emmvee | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 2 (1.2%) | | 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 55 (34.4%) | | 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 47 (29.4%) | | 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 45 (28.1%) | | 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 11 (6.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%) | Technology | Emmvee | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 66 (41.2%) | | PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 84 (52.5%) | | N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 4 (2.5%) | | HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) | ## Top panels, Emmvee | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Seraphim | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Emmvee is an Indian manufacturer headquartered in Bengaluru that traces its roots to 1992, though its dedicated PV module business began in 2007, and it has since become one of the fastest-scaling suppliers in the Indian market. The company has rapidly expanded capacity, moving from roughly 6.6 GW of module output in mid-2025 to over 10 GW by early 2026, and adopted TOPCon cell technology through a research partnership with Germany's Fraunhofer ISE. Emmvee was the only Indian manufacturer to earn Top Performer status across all seven test categories in the Kiwa PVEL 2024 Reliability Scorecard, a strong bankability signal. Seraphim, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in Changzhou in 2011, with global production capacity around 13 GW spread across facilities in China, Vietnam and South Africa, and has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status continuously for over a decade, giving it a longer institutional track record than the younger Emmvee. Both brands cover residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments. Seraphim has the broader technology portfolio, offering not only TOPCon modules (Sable series) but also heterojunction HJT panels (Hydra series) and flexible modules, making it a versatile pick for specialized installations. Emmvee focuses primarily on TOPCon and monocrystalline PERC modules, with an emphasis on turnkey EPC delivery for both rooftop and utility-scale projects, mainly serving the Indian and US markets. For an international buyer, the two brands are largely comparable on independently verified quality, as both have repeatedly earned PVEL Top Performer recognition. Seraphim's edge lies in its longer, proven presence in overseas markets and broader warranty servicing footprint, while Emmvee is the faster-rising challenger, worth considering particularly where confirmed TOPCon performance and rapid capacity growth are priorities. Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim) - [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim) - [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-seraphim Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.