---
title: "Emmvee vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emmvee vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-risen"
---

# Emmvee vs Risen

Emmvee has the broader catalog (166 vs 153 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emmvee | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru | Ninghai |
| Founded | 1992 | 1986 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emmvee | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 166 | 153 | +13 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 745 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 526 W | 547 W | +21 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emmvee | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 24.00% | +0.49 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 21.82% | +0.13 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emmvee | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.020 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 125 (82%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emmvee | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Emmvee | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | Emmvee | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 48 (31.4%) |


## Top panels, Emmvee


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Emmvee is an Indian solar module manufacturer headquartered in Bengaluru that has rapidly scaled up production through 2025 and 2026, expanding module capacity from 6.6 GW to over 10.3 GW annually alongside nearly 3 GW of cell capacity, including a new TOPCon line. The company has earned quality recognition by passing Kiwa PVEL's full Product Qualification Program as one of only four manufacturers worldwide to do so, and reaches Europe through its Berlin-based subsidiary Emmvee Energy GmbH, though its export track record remains far shorter than that of the established Chinese majors. Risen Energy, a Chinese manufacturer, has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for multiple consecutive quarters, with annual production capacity exceeding 48 GW and cumulative shipments topping 114 GW; it runs its European operations from a Madrid hub covering markets including Spain, Portugal, Italy and Eastern Europe, giving it a distinctly stronger institutional footprint and bankability.

Both brands build on TOPCon and PERC cell platforms, with Risen also fielding HJT technology, allowing each to address residential rooftop, commercial and utility-scale segments. Emmvee focuses on high-efficiency TOPCon and bifacial modules (up to roughly 23.5 percent efficiency) aimed primarily at rooftop and C&I buyers, while Risen fields a broader, more mature lineup - the mainstream Titan series for residential installs, TOPCon panels for commercial projects, and the high-performance Hyper-ion HJT series (up to 700 W, around 22.5 percent efficiency) for utility-scale deployments and hot climates.

For a typical buyer, particularly in Europe, Risen remains the lower-risk default choice thanks to its longer supply track record, established Tier 1 standing, and regional service presence. Emmvee is a brand worth watching given its rapidly growing capacity and strong PVEL test results, but for now it suits projects where supply flexibility from India matters more than a long-standing reference history in European markets.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.