--- title: "Emmvee vs Renewsys - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee vs Renewsys solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-renewsys" --- # Emmvee vs Renewsys Emmvee has the broader catalog (166 vs 45 models). Renewsys leads on peak efficiency at 23.64%. Renewsys leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Emmvee | Renewsys | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | India | India | | Headquarters | Bengaluru | Mumbai | | Founded | 1992 | 2011 | | Employees | | 1,071 | | Annual capacity | | 2.5 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [http://www.renewsysworld.com](http://www.renewsysworld.com) | RenewSys is the first integrated manufacturer of Solar PV Modules and its key components - Encapsulants, Backsheets, and Solar PV Cells. Established in 2012, RenewSys is the renewable energy arm of the ENPEE Group, a diversified global conglomerate. They have manufacturing facilities in Hyderabad and Bengaluru. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Emmvee | Renewsys | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 166 | 45 | +121 | | Max Power | 720 W | 650 W | +70 W | | Avg Power | 526 W | 542 W | +16 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Emmvee | Renewsys | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 23.64% | +0.13 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 22.57% | +0.88 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Emmvee | Renewsys | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.017 | | Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 45 (100%) | +45 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +3.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Renewsys skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Emmvee | Renewsys | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 8 (17.8%) | | 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 26 (57.8%) | | 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 11 (24.4%) | ## Power distribution Renewsys offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup) | Power band | Emmvee | Renewsys | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 17 (37.8%) | | 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 12 (26.7%) | | 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 16 (35.6%) | | 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%) | Technology | Emmvee | Renewsys | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 45 (100.0%) | | PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 0 | | N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Emmvee | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Renewsys | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-650) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-645](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-635) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-635) | 635 | 22.8 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-630) | 630 | 23.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-625) | 625 | 22.4 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-625) | 625 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-620) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline | ## Other comparisons - [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-renewsys) - [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-renewsys) - [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-renewsys) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-renewsys Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.