--- title: "Emmvee vs Hanersun - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Emmvee vs Hanersun solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-hanersun" --- # Emmvee vs Hanersun Hanersun has the broader catalog (254 vs 166 models). Hanersun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. ## The two companies | Attribute | Emmvee | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | India | China | | Headquarters | Bengaluru | Nanjing | | Founded | 1992 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [https://www.hanersun.com](https://www.hanersun.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Emmvee | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 166 | 254 | +88 | | Max Power | 720 W | 750 W | +30 W | | Avg Power | 526 W | 540 W | +14 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Emmvee | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 24.80% | +1.29 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 22.19% | +0.51 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Emmvee | Hanersun | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.011 | | Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 136 (54%) | +1 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +1.6 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Hanersun skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Emmvee | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 2 (0.8%) | | 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 32 (12.6%) | | 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 70 (27.6%) | | 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 94 (37.0%) | | 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 56 (22.0%) | ## Power distribution Hanersun offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup) | Power band | Emmvee | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 8 (3.1%) | | 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 108 (42.5%) | | 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 48 (18.9%) | | 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 76 (29.9%) | | 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 14 (5.5%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%) | Technology | Emmvee | Hanersun | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 170 (66.9%) | | PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 57 (22.4%) | | N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 9 (3.5%) | | Back Contact | 0 | 18 (7.1%) | ## Top panels, Emmvee | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Hanersun | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HN21N-66HT750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HN21N-66HT745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HN21N-66HT740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HN21N-66HT735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HN21N-66HT730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HN21N-66HT725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht725w) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HN21N-66HT720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HN21N-66HT715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HN21N-66HT710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66ht710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HN21N-66H705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanersun-hn21n-66h705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Emmvee is an Indian solar module manufacturer headquartered in Bengaluru, founded in 1992 as a solar water-heater business before evolving into a major PV producer. It now operates roughly 6.6-10 GW of annual module capacity and around 2.5-3 GW of TOPCon cell capacity, and it is the only Indian company to pass all seven Kiwa PVEL 2024 reliability tests, a strong signal for bankability even though it is not yet formally listed among the established BloombergNEF Tier 1 names in the way Hanersun is. Hanersun, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer based in Nanjing, founded in 2015, and was named a BloombergNEF Tier 1 module supplier back in 2023 on the strength of its 600W+ high-power products, though an independent PV Tech bankability assessment rated the company CCC+, a tier below many longer-established brands. Institutionally, Emmvee appears to carry a somewhat stronger reliability and manufacturing footprint, while Hanersun leans more on early technological positioning and Tier 1 recognition. Both companies build primarily around N-type TOPCon cells: Hanersun has also invested in heterojunction (HJT) lines and is best known for pioneering 600W+ and 700W+ ultra-high-power modules aimed at both residential rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with a claimed cumulative delivery of over 16 GW by the end of 2025. Emmvee offers a broader mix spanning PERC, monocrystalline, and TOPCon modules across residential, commercial, and industrial segments, and its rapidly growing order book, close to 9.9 GW as of mid-2026, points to solid traction with independent power producers and C&I buyers. For an international buyer choosing between the two, Hanersun currently has a longer track record of export sales and brand recognition in high-power module niches, while Emmvee is a fast-scaling manufacturer with strong reliability testing results but a shorter history of global distribution outside India and the US. The two are not strictly interchangeable: buyers prioritizing established export logistics and Tier 1 pedigree may lean toward Hanersun, while those valuing recent reliability certifications and rapid capacity growth may prefer Emmvee, but in either case checking the specific distributor's warranty support and local references remains the practical deciding factor. Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hanersun) - [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hanersun) - [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Hanersun](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hanersun) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-hanersun Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.