---
title: "Emmvee vs Gamko New Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emmvee vs Gamko New Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-gamko-new-energy"
---

# Emmvee vs Gamko New Energy

Gamko New Energy has the broader catalog (255 vs 166 models). Gamko New Energy leads on peak efficiency at 24.14%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru | Nantong, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 1992 | 2008 |
| Employees |  | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [http://www.gamkosolar.com](http://www.gamkosolar.com) |

Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 166 | 255 | +89 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 750 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 526 W | 500 W | +26 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 24.14% | +0.63 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 22.03% | +0.34 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.332%/°C | +0.021 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 207 (81%) | +26 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 9 (3.5%) |
| 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 64 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 46 (18.0%) |
| 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 35 (13.7%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 101 (39.6%) |


## Power distribution

Gamko New Energy offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 47 (18.4%) |
| 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 71 (27.8%) |
| 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 79 (31.0%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 42 (16.5%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 16 (6.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (57%)


| Technology | Emmvee | Gamko New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 146 (57.3%) |
| PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 106 (41.6%) |
| N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 0 | 3 (1.2%) |


## Top panels, Emmvee


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Gamko New Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GKA210N132](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GKA210N132-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GKA210N132-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GKA210N132-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GKA210N132-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GKA210N132-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GKA210N132-720W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w-series) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GKA210N132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GKA210N132-715W (series)](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w-series) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [GKA210N132-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka210n132-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Emmvee is an Indian manufacturer headquartered in Bengaluru, with origins in solar thermal systems dating back to 1992 and a dedicated photovoltaic division - Emmvee Photovoltaic Power - established in 2007. By April 2025 the company had expanded its module production capacity to 6.6 GWp and cell capacity to 2.5 GWp, making it one of India's largest vertically integrated solar producers. It operates a European trading subsidiary, Emmvee Energy GmbH in Berlin, giving it a structured distribution channel for EU procurement and project finance. Emmvee is also the only Indian manufacturer to have passed all seven categories of the Kiwa PVEL 2024 Reliability Scorecard, a meaningful independent quality benchmark that carries weight with lenders and EPCs. A confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing was not found in publicly available sources at the time of writing, but the company's broader institutional footprint - including an IPO filing and a 4.5 GWp TOPCon cell supply agreement - is substantially larger than most mid-tier peers. Gamko New Energy, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer based in Nantong, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2017, with annual production capacity of approximately 1.2 GW as of 2023. It holds standard certifications including CE, TUV, IEC, and ISO, but no Tier 1 recognition or independent reliability scorecard results were identified in available sources. On institutional standing alone, Emmvee is the clearer leader.

Emmvee's product families cover residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount segments, built around Mono PERC and TOPCon cell technologies. The company actively exports to Europe, India, Africa, and the Middle East, with its Berlin entity supporting bankable project structures in the EU. Gamko's catalog is wider in format terms - ranging from small off-grid panels through to large-format modules reportedly up to 800 W - and the company positions itself primarily as a flexible OEM supplier, collaborating with manufacturing partners in South Korea and the United States. Its technology mix includes PERC and TOPCon modules, with a focus on price-sensitive residential and small commercial buyers.

For most international buyers seeking modules for grid-connected, financed installations, Emmvee is the stronger default: it offers a documented quality track record, a European legal entity, and a manufacturing base several times larger than Gamko's. Gamko may suit buyers looking for flexible small-volume OEM arrangements or off-grid hardware, but its limited institutional profile makes lender and insurer approval considerably harder to secure on larger projects.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Gamko New Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-gamko-new-energy)
- [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Gamko New Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-gamko-new-energy)
- [Emmvee vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Gamko New Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-gamko-new-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-gamko-new-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

