---
title: "Emmvee vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Emmvee vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aiko"
---

# Emmvee vs AIKO

Emmvee has the broader catalog (166 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Emmvee leans bifacial (55% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Emmvee | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1992 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com](https://www.emmveephotovoltaic.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Emmvee | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 166 | 144 | +22 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 805 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 526 W | 581 W | +55 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Emmvee | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 25.20% | +1.69 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.69% | 23.65% | +1.97 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Emmvee | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.311%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 91 (55%) | 35 (24%) | +31 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +2.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Emmvee | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (0.6%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 48 (28.9%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 47 (28.3%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 54 (32.5%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (9.6%) | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Emmvee | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (3.6%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 62 (37.3%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 72 (43.4%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (9.6%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (6.0%) | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (61%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Emmvee | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 102 (61.4%) | 0 |
| PERC | 63 (38.0%) | 7 (4.9%) |
| N-type | 1 (0.6%) | 17 (11.8%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Emmvee


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [E720HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg-132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [E720HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e720hcbg132-t) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [E715HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg-132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [E715HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e715hcbg132-t) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [E710HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg-132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [E710HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e710hcbg132-t) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [E705HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg-132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [E705HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e705hcbg132-t) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [E700HCBG 132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg-132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [E700HCBG132-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/emmvee-e700hcbg132-t) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that has achieved Tier 1 bankability status from BloombergNEF and operates at substantial scale, with production capacity reported around 20-35 GW per year and a new Jinan facility designed for 30 GW of cell and module output using its proprietary ABC back-contact architecture. Emmvee, headquartered in Bengaluru, India, is a much smaller player by comparison, with current module capacity around 10.3 GW and cell capacity near 2.94 GW, but it stands out as the only Indian manufacturer to pass all seven Kiwa PVEL 2024 Reliability Scorecard tests, a meaningful bankability signal in its own right. On institutional footprint and global brand recognition, AIKO clearly has the stronger position.

AIKO's flagship technology is ABC (all-back-contact), which moves all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell, yielding high efficiencies (record figures around 25.2-25.6%) along with better fire-resistance ratings and lower hot-spot temperatures than typical TOPCon modules - making it well suited to residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and aesthetics-sensitive installations. Emmvee, by contrast, has built its identity around bifacial TOPCon modules, developed in partnership with Germany's Fraunhofer ISE, and supplies primarily the Indian market, including large utility-scale supply agreements with domestic independent power producers.

For a typical international buyer, AIKO is the safer default choice given its wider export track record, larger manufacturing base, and differentiated ABC technology. Emmvee is a compelling option mainly for buyers prioritizing non-Chinese-headquartered manufacturing or the Indian market specifically, but its more limited international distribution and smaller scale mean the two brands are not straightforwardly interchangeable outside that context.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Emmvee vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Emmvee vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Emmvee vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/emmvee-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.