--- title: "EGing PV vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare EGing PV vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-znshine" --- # EGing PV vs ZNShine ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 131 models). ZNShine leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. ## The two companies | Attribute | EGing PV | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Changzhou | Suqian | | Founded | 2003 | 1988 | | Employees | | 1,200 | | Annual capacity | | 10 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | SZSE: 600537 | NEEQ: 838463 | | Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) | ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | EGing PV | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 131 | 212 | +81 | | Max Power | 685 W | 670 W | +15 W | | Avg Power | 504 W | 535 W | +30 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | EGing PV | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 22.83% | +0.38 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 21.35% | +0.45 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | EGing PV | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.007 | | Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 89 (42%) | +3 pp | | Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.3 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | EGing PV | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 5 (2.4%) | | 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 59 (27.8%) | | 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 101 (47.6%) | | 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 47 (22.2%) | ## Power distribution EGing PV offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup) | Power band | EGing PV | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 6 (2.8%) | | 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 64 (30.2%) | | 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 99 (46.7%) | | 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 43 (20.3%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%) | Technology | EGing PV | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 134 (63.2%) | | TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 78 (36.8%) | ## Top panels, EGing PV | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, ZNShine | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary EGing PV is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou (Jintan district), founded in 2003 and publicly listed on the Shanghai A-share market since 2011. The company operates two manufacturing bases in Changzhou and Chuzhou, with a confirmed module production capacity exceeding 10 GW per year. EGing PV holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, meaning it qualifies as a bankable supplier for project finance. ZNShine (ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd.) is also a Chinese manufacturer with production facilities in Changzhou, Suqian, and Dali, and a total capacity of 10 GW. ZNShine has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2013 - thirteen consecutive years as of 2025 - and additionally holds a B rating in the PV Tech bankability ranking. On institutional track record alone, ZNShine holds a modest edge over EGing PV, given its longer unbroken run on the Tier 1 list. EGing PV's current product focus is centered on N-type TOPCon modules, including residential-scale panels around the 440 W range and larger formats for commercial and utility applications. The company was named a Top Performer by PV Evolution Labs in 2024 reliability testing across multiple categories including thermal cycling, damp heat, and mechanical stress - a meaningful independent quality signal. ZNShine offers a broader technology mix, with both N-type TOPCon and HJT modules reaching up to 750 W, with its flagship lineup clearly oriented toward utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects. Both manufacturers supply bifacial formats suited for ground-mounted solar farms, and both have received PVEL Top Performer recognition - ZNShine for seven consecutive years through 2025. For most international buyers, EGing PV and ZNShine are largely interchangeable: both are bankable Tier 1 suppliers at comparable scale with independently verified module reliability. ZNShine may be the stronger default for utility-scale procurement given its broader high-wattage HJT and TOPCon portfolio and the longer institutional track record. EGing PV is a well-suited option for residential and commercial rooftop projects where PVEL-tested performance and competitive pricing matter most. Neither brand presents a clear universal advantage - project-specific requirements, local distributor support, and prevailing module prices should drive the final selection. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine) - [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine) - [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-znshine Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.