---
title: "EGing PV vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-trina-solar"
---

# EGing PV vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 131 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | EGing PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600537 |  |
| Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EGing PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 131 | 340 | +209 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 760 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 504 W | 520 W | +16 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EGing PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 24.80% | +2.35 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 21.71% | +0.81 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EGing PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.034 |
| Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 145 (43%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EGing PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | EGing PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | EGing PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EGing PV is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2003 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company began as a silicon ingot producer before developing into a fully integrated maker of photovoltaic cells and modules, completing a Shanghai A-share IPO in 2011. EGing PV holds Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status and claims a combined cell and module production capacity of over 25 GW, though some independent sources estimate actual module output from its main Changzhou facility at around 5 GW. Trina Solar, also headquartered in Changzhou and founded in 1997 by Jifan Gao, is one of the longest-established names in global photovoltaics. It shipped 65.21 GW of modules in 2023 and approximately 77 GW in 2024, ranking third globally by shipment volume. Trina holds a durable Bloomberg Tier 1 recognition and has set 26 world records on cell and module efficiency. On institutional footprint, Trina Solar is substantially larger and more deeply embedded in project finance, utility procurement, and global supply chains.

Trina Solar's flagship range is the Vertex series, built around 210 mm large-format wafers. The Vertex N line uses n-type i-TOPCon technology, with mass-produced panels reaching up to 760 W - making it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects. The Vertex S+ series serves residential and commercial rooftop segments with more compact TOPCon panels. EGing PV offers a wide catalog covering PERC, bifacial, and N-type TOPCon modules from approximately 120 Wp to 745 Wp, including a dedicated N-TOPCon line using 182 mm cells. The company also produces color-option modules aimed at building-integrated photovoltaics. In 2024 independent laboratory testing, EGing ranked among the top performers across six stress categories - including thermal cycling and damp heat - suggesting solid long-term field reliability.

For most international buyers, whether project developers sourcing for utility scale or integrators supplying the C&I market, Trina Solar is the stronger default choice, backed by its scale, proven bankability, and deep supply chain relationships. EGing PV is a credible Tier 1 alternative suited to residential rooftop and smaller commercial projects where competitive pricing matters. For purchases below a few megawatts, both brands offer comparable reliability and either would satisfy most buyers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.