---
title: "EGing PV vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-sunova"
---

# EGing PV vs Sunova

Sunova has the broader catalog (183 vs 131 models). Sunova leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | EGing PV | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Hefei |
| Founded | 2003 | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 600537 |  |
| Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EGing PV | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 131 | 183 | +52 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 720 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 504 W | 523 W | +19 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EGing PV | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 23.20% | +0.75 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 21.60% | +0.70 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EGing PV | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.019 |
| Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 168 (92%) | +53 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sunova skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EGing PV | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 46 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 70 (38.3%) |
| 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 57 (31.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 10 (5.5%) |


## Power distribution

Sunova offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | EGing PV | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 84 (45.9%) |
| 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 58 (31.7%) |
| 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 31 (16.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 10 (5.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | EGing PV | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 89 (48.6%) |
| TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 12 (6.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 72 (39.3%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 10 (5.5%) |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EGing PV is a Chinese solar module manufacturer generally positioned within the mid-tier segment of Chinese photovoltaic producers. The company is primarily known in Asian markets and in select European markets, where it is understood to supply modules for commercial rooftop and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Its bankability status - for instance, inclusion on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists - could not be confirmed through available web search results at the time of writing, and claims about its institutional standing should therefore be treated as unverified pending direct review of current industry rankings.

Sunova is likewise a Chinese solar panel manufacturer, one that is broadly associated with a focus on higher-efficiency cell technologies, including the TOPCon segment. The company is typically positioned as a value-oriented supplier targeting installers who prioritize efficiency-per-cost ratios for both residential rooftop and commercial installations. As with EGing PV, specific figures regarding annual production capacity in gigawatts, product certifications, and formal bankability status could not be sourced from publicly indexed material during this analysis.

For an international buyer evaluating these two brands side by side, both occupy a broadly comparable market tier and appear interchangeable for many standard procurement scenarios. The more decisive factors are likely to be distributor availability in the target market, local warranty service infrastructure, and current module pricing rather than a fundamental technology or bankability gap between the two. Buyers considering either brand for a financed project should independently verify Tier 1 status against the most current BloombergNEF or equivalent report before committing.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova)
- [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunova)
- [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunova)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-sunova

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.