---
title: "EGing PV vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-risen"
---

# EGing PV vs Risen

Risen has the broader catalog (153 vs 131 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | EGing PV | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Ninghai |
| Founded | 2003 | 1986 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600537 | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EGing PV | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 131 | 153 | +22 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 745 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 504 W | 547 W | +43 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EGing PV | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 24.00% | +1.55 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 21.82% | +0.92 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EGing PV | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.045 |
| Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 125 (82%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EGing PV | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | EGing PV | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | EGing PV | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 48 (31.4%) |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EGing PV is a Chinese cell and module manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 2003 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. It appears on Bloomberg NEF's Tier 1 list, signaling acceptance by project financiers, but its annual production capacity of roughly a few gigawatts is modest compared with the industry's largest players. Risen Energy, established in 1986 in China (originally in rubber and plastics before entering solar in 2002), also holds Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status and operates at a much larger scale, with production reported around 48 GW per year, making it one of the world's biggest module makers. In terms of scale and international footprint, Risen clearly has the stronger institutional presence.

EGing PV's lineup centers on monocrystalline PERC half-cut modules in its Star and Star Pro series, spanning roughly 385 to 580 W and aimed at residential and commercial rooftops, alongside a budget Convention series without PERC; the company has also released TOPCon modules up to around 685 W. Risen has pushed further along the technology curve, phasing out its older PERC Titan line in favor of TOPCon modules for commercial roofs and smaller systems, plus bifacial heterojunction (HJT) panels under its Hyper-ion brand for large utility-scale ground-mount projects.

For a typical international buyer, Risen is generally the safer default choice given its larger manufacturing base, broader service network, and more advanced HJT/TOPCon offering, while EGing PV may suit smaller, budget-conscious installations, though independent testing (such as a 2023 evaluation by the Australian Capital Territory government) has shown it underperforming relative to competitors.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.