---
title: "EGing PV vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-q-cells"
---

# EGing PV vs Q-Cells

EGing PV has the broader catalog (131 vs 89 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | EGing PV | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Seoul |
| Founded | 2003 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600537 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EGing PV | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 131 | 89 | +42 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 675 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 504 W | 468 W | +36 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EGing PV | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 23.20% | +0.75 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 21.21% | +0.32 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EGing PV | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 35 (39%) | +0 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EGing PV | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

EGing PV offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | EGing PV | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | EGing PV | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EGing PV is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 2003 and later expanded with cell production facilities in Chuzhou. The company has held Bloomberg Tier 1 status and built up nominal module capacity of around 10 GW, though a pv-tech.org report from 2025 noted that EGing posted a $288 million net loss for 2024 and was running its module lines at well below 40% utilization, with its PERC and TOPCon cell facilities in pause. Those financial headwinds put EGing in a clearly weaker institutional position than many of its peers. Q CELLS, by contrast, is the solar brand of Hanwha Solutions, a South Korean conglomerate, tracing its origins to the German pioneer Solarworld spinoff Q-Cells SE, which Hanwha acquired in 2012. Q CELLS maintains Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status and, according to Wood Mackenzie, held roughly 25% of the U.S. residential market and 13% of the U.S. commercial market as of 2025, with manufacturing footprints in South Korea, Malaysia, China, and a large facility in Dalton, Georgia. On institutional footprint and financial resilience, Q CELLS is clearly the stronger entity.

In terms of product families, EGing PV offers mono-crystalline modules targeting budget to mid-range commercial and utility-scale applications, and has been adding N-type TOPCon lines to its portfolio. Independent testing results have been mixed: EGing panels scored well on thermal cycling and damp-heat stress in some 2024 reports, but performed below average in accelerated aging tests conducted by the ACT Government in Australia. Q CELLS' flagship residential and commercial ranges - centered on its proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO N-type TOPCon technology - deliver panel efficiencies up to around 22.5%, backed by 25-year product warranties. The company has also secured IEC and UL certifications for a perovskite-silicon tandem cell demonstrating 28.6% efficiency, signaling a credible long-term technology roadmap. Q CELLS panels are widely used for premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial ground mounts where warranty enforceability and heat performance matter.

For most buyers in 2025, Q CELLS is the more defensible default: its warranty is backed by a large conglomerate with demonstrated U.S. and European support infrastructure, its Q.ANTUM NEO TOPCon line is competitive on efficiency, and its market share leadership reduces counterparty risk. EGing PV can still be a reasonable choice where price sensitivity is the primary driver and the installer has strong local support, but buyers should weigh the manufacturer's current financial difficulties against a 25-to-30-year warranty horizon.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/eging-pvs-struggles-reflect-profitability-challenges-for-chinese-solar-producers/ \| EGing PV's struggles reflect profitability challenges for Chinese solar producers \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/27/chinese-pv-industry-brief-eging-pv-posts-288-million-net-loss-for-2024/ \| EGing PV posts $288 million net loss for 2024 - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025: Expert Analysis \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/eging-solar-panels-review/ \| EGing Solar Panels: Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

Sources:

\- \[EGing PV's struggles reflect profitability challenges - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/eging-pvs-struggles-reflect-profitability-challenges-for-chinese-solar-producers/)

\- \[EGing PV posts $288 million net loss for 2024 - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/27/chinese-pv-industry-brief-eging-pv-posts-288-million-net-loss-for-2024/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/)

\- \[EGing Solar Panels: Independent Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/eging-solar-panels-review/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.