---
title: "EGing PV vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EGing PV vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# EGing PV vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 131 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | EGing PV | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2003 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600537 | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.egingpv.com](https://www.egingpv.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EGing PV | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 131 | 637 | +506 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 735 W | +50 W |
| Avg Power | 504 W | 523 W | +18 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EGing PV | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.45% | 24.80% | +2.35 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.90% | 22.18% | +1.28 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EGing PV | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.336%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 51 (39%) | 231 (36%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EGing PV | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (9.9%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 58 (44.3%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 51 (38.9%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 9 (6.9%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | EGing PV | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (19.1%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 40 (30.5%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 37 (28.2%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 29 (22.1%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | EGing PV | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 100 (76.3%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| TOPCon | 31 (23.7%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, EGing PV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-685nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-680nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-675nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [EG-670M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-hu-bf-dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [EG-670M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-670m66-huv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [EG-665M66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-hu-bf-dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [EG-665M66-HUV](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-665m66-huv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/eging-pv-eg-660nt66-hu-bf-dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EGing PV, founded in 2003 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), is one of the older dedicated PV module manufacturers in China, with a focused portfolio of 131 panels. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, has grown into the world's top solar module supplier by shipment volume, holding approximately 13% global market share and ranking first in global module deliveries in H1 2025. Both carry Tier 1 bankable status, but the gap in scale is substantial: Jinko Solar employs over 33,000 people, declares a production capacity of 130 GW, and maintains a catalog of 545 panels, giving it considerably greater supply chain depth and international financial visibility compared to EGing PV's more regional footprint. Jinko's NYSE listing also tends to ease due-diligence requirements for project lenders in Western markets.

From a technology perspective, EGing PV's lineup is centered on PERC cell technology (approximately 75% of its portfolio), with a maximum module efficiency of 22.45% and a portfolio average of 20.9%. Its bifaciality share of roughly 39% is a positive trait for its market segment. Jinko Solar has made a decisive shift toward N-type TOPCon, which accounts for around 39% of its much larger catalog, driving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a portfolio average of 22.0%. Jinko's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is meaningfully better than EGing's -0.336%/°C, resulting in lower power losses during high-temperature operation - a relevant factor for commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount sites. Jinko's average warranty of approximately 28.5 years also exceeds EGing's roughly 26.9 years. For residential rooftop installs, EGing's PERC-based Tier 1 modules remain a cost-competitive choice. For utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects, Jinko's TOPCon portfolio, longer warranty terms, and 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer recognitions make it the more compelling option.

For international buyers weighing the two, Jinko Solar offers superior technology trajectory, broader supply availability, and stronger project finance credentials - advantages that matter most in large or institutionally funded installations. EGing PV is a credible Tier 1 choice for smaller, cost-sensitive residential or light commercial applications, though its reported financial difficulties in 2024 - including a sharp revenue decline and a significant net loss - are a material consideration when assessing the long-term reliability of its warranty backstop.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EGing PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [EGing PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [EGing PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/eging-pv-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

