---
title: "EcoFlow vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare EcoFlow vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ecoflow-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# EcoFlow vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Employees | 1000+ | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.ecoflow.com](https://www.ecoflow.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

EcoFlow is a company founded in 2017 that develops portable power stations, smart devices, and home energy systems. They offer a range of products including portable power stations, solar panels, and smart home solutions. EcoFlow's mission is to provide eco-friendly energy solutions for individuals, families, and...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | EcoFlow | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

EcoFlow and Jinko Solar are both China-headquartered companies operating under the broad solar energy umbrella, but they serve fundamentally different markets. EcoFlow was founded in 2017 and has built its brand around portable power stations and mobile solar panels designed for off-grid use cases such as camping, RVs, boats, and balcony micro-installations. It does not manufacture conventional rooftop or ground-mount PV modules and carries no panel entries in standard industry databases, nor does it hold a Tier 1 bankability rating from financial institutions. Jinko Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2006, is listed on the NYSE, and ranks among the largest PV manufacturers globally, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,800, and a firmly established Tier 1 bankable status recognized by independent assessors worldwide.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 module variants spans a wide range of applications, with peak module power reaching 735 Wp and an average module efficiency of approximately 22%, underpinned by N-type TOPCon cell technology in the flagship Tiger Neo 3.0 series. The company's average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and average product warranty of 28.5 years make its modules well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount farms alike. Jinko has recorded 11 consecutive PVEL Top Performer designations and surpassed 300 GW of cumulative global shipments, reinforcing its reputation for manufacturing consistency. EcoFlow's panel range, while innovative in portability and integration with its own battery systems, is targeted at consumers seeking plug-and-play off-grid energy solutions rather than grid-tied PV installations requiring professional commissioning.

For international buyers - whether residential homeowners, commercial developers, or utility-scale project financiers - Jinko Solar is the directly relevant choice when selecting bankable, high-performance modules for permanent installations. EcoFlow fills a distinct niche for buyers prioritizing mobile or emergency backup power, particularly within its own ecosystem of portable energy storage products, but it should not be evaluated as a like-for-like alternative to a full-scale PV module manufacturer such as Jinko Solar.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [EcoFlow vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ecoflow-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [EcoFlow vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ecoflow-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [EcoFlow vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ecoflow-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ecoflow-vs-jinko-solar