---
title: "Easun Power vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Easun Power vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/easun-power-vs-akcome"
---

# Easun Power vs AKCOME

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 2 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Easun Power | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 2003 |
| Employees | 51-100 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.easunpower.com](https://www.easunpower.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

EASUN Power, founded in 2006, specializes in solar inverters and battery storage solutions. With nearly two decades of expertise, they are dedicated to delivering efficient and reliable energy solutions for residential, commercial, and off-grid applications. The company aims to provide affordable and innovative solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Easun Power | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 2 | 3 | +1 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 700 W | +500 W |
| Avg Power | 150 W | 672 W | +522 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Easun Power | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 20.50% | 22.54% | +2.04 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.07% | 21.63% | +1.56 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Easun Power | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.400%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.160 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Easun Power | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (50.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 1 (50.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Easun Power | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Easun Power | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 2 (100.0%) | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Easun Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YH200W-12M](https://comparepv.com/panel/easun-power-yh200w-12m) | 200 | 20.5 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YH100W-12M](https://comparepv.com/panel/easun-power-yh100w-12m) | 100 | 19.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Both AKCOME and Easun Power are China-based solar manufacturers, though they occupy very different positions in the market. AKCOME, founded in 2003, grew into a gigawatt-scale producer of heterojunction (HJT) modules, announcing a 4.6 GW HJT production base expansion and targeting 8.2 GW of HJT capacity by 2024. Despite this scale, the company lost its BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 - in part because Zhejiang Akcome Photoelectricity Technology filed for bankruptcy proceedings that year, raising serious concerns about financial continuity. Easun Power, founded in 2006, is a much smaller operation with 51-100 employees, primarily recognized as a hybrid inverter and off-grid storage brand that sells panels as part of its broader product ecosystem. Neither company currently carries Tier 1 bankable status, which limits their appeal for project finance and utility-scale procurement.

The two lineups could hardly be more different in portfolio character. AKCOME's three analyzed panels are exclusively high-power, 100% bifacial HJT modules averaging 671.7 Wp and peaking at 700 Wp, with an average efficiency of 21.63% and a top figure of 22.54%. Its temperature coefficient averages a very competitive -0.24%/°C, and a 30-year product warranty is standard across the range - a spec sheet that targets utility-scale ground mounts, agrivoltaic installations, and premium large-format commercial projects where bifacial gain and thermal performance matter. Easun Power's two panels, by contrast, average just 150 Wp and top out at 200 Wp, with average efficiency of 20.07% and a noticeably weaker temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C. All panels in Easun's lineup are monofacial. These are compact, budget panels aimed squarely at small off-grid cabins, caravans, or as companion modules bundled with the company's own inverter products.

For a typical buyer comparing the two in 2025, the choice depends entirely on the application rather than on brand prestige. A residential or commercial installer seeking large-format, high-output bifacial modules should look at AKCOME's HJT lineup, keeping in mind the real financial risk flagged by its loss of Tier 1 status and the bankruptcy proceedings affecting part of its corporate structure - insurance and long-term warranty backing deserve careful due diligence. Easun Power's panels are not a competitor in that space at all; they exist as low-wattage accessories within an inverter-centric product line. Buyers needing compact off-grid panels to pair with an Easun inverter may find them convenient, but should not expect the efficiency, bifacial gain, or warranty depth that AKCOME's flagship modules provide.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pvtime.org/4-6gw-akcome-to-launch-hjt-production-base-in-china/ \| Akcome to launch 4.6 GW HJT production base in China \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/ \| Akcome unveils new 730 W heterojunction solar modules \| article

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME HJT solar panel overview and specs \| review

\- https://www.solarbeglobal.com/Akcome-plans-to-build-8-2-GW-HJT-production-plant-by-2024/ \| Akcome plans 8.2 GW HJT production plant by 2024 \| article

\- https://diysolarforum.com/threads/any-actual-experience-with-easun.52444/ \| DIY Solar Forum - user experience thread on Easun Power \| review

Sources:

\- \[PVTIME - Akcome 4.6 GW HJT Production Base\](https://www.pvtime.org/4-6gw-akcome-to-launch-hjt-production-base-in-china/)

\- \[PV Magazine - Akcome 730 W HJT Module\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/)

\- \[HJTPV - AKCOME Solar Panel Review\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/)

\- \[Solarbe Global - Akcome 8.2 GW HJT Plant\](https://www.solarbeglobal.com/Akcome-plans-to-build-8-2-GW-HJT-production-plant-by-2024/)

\- \[DIY Solar Forum - Easun Power User Experiences\](https://diysolarforum.com/threads/any-actual-experience-with-easun.52444/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Easun Power vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/easun-power-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Easun Power vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/easun-power-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Easun Power vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/easun-power-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/easun-power-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

