--- title: "Dyness vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Dyness vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-trina-solar" --- # Dyness vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Dyness | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Changzhou | | Founded | 2017 | 1997 | | Employees | 200+ | | | Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.dynesspower.com](https://www.dynesspower.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Dyness | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 | | Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Dyness | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Dyness | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Dyness | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Dyness | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Dyness | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) | | PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Dyness is a Chinese company headquartered in Suzhou, founded in 2017, with a focus on battery energy storage systems rather than solar panel manufacturing. With over 550 employees and an R&D team of more than 150 engineers, Dyness distributes its storage products across more than 100 countries and has reached over one million end users. It is important to note upfront that Dyness does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists for photovoltaic module manufacturers; its industry recognition comes from the energy storage segment, where it earned the EUPD Research Top Brand Storage UK award in 2025. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, and has grown into one of the four largest solar module producers globally, holding continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and an annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW as of mid-2025. In terms of institutional footprint, financial backing, and market credibility as a solar panel manufacturer, Trina Solar stands in a different league entirely. Dyness's product range centers on residential, commercial, and industrial battery storage solutions - including the PowerBox G2, the Stack100 Pro, and liquid-cooled modular systems for large-scale deployments. These products are designed to complement solar installations but are not solar panels themselves. Trina Solar, on the other hand, fields a comprehensive module portfolio built entirely around n-type TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex S+ series targets residential rooftop and small commercial installations, the flagship Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra reaches outputs of up to 760 W with a 24.5% conversion efficiency for utility-scale ground-mount projects, and specialized hail- and wind-resistant variants extend usability into demanding environments. Trina also holds the first UL 61730 certification for 2,000-V 210 mm modules, enabling the largest utility-scale deployments in international markets. For a buyer seeking solar panels, Trina Solar is the clear and well-documented choice - bankable, broadly certified, and available across residential, C&I, and utility segments with a deep product bench. Dyness occupies a complementary role as a battery storage provider and should not be evaluated as a solar module alternative. The two brands are better understood as potential partners within the same energy system than as competitors in the same product category. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Dyness vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [Dyness vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [Dyness vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-trina-solar