---
title: "Dyness vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Dyness vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Dyness vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Dyness | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Employees | 200+ | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.dynesspower.com](https://www.dynesspower.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Dyness | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Dyness | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Dyness | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Dyness | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Dyness | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Dyness | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Dyness and Jinko Solar are both Chinese companies in the broader solar energy sector, but they operate in fundamentally different product categories and should not be compared as direct competitors. Dyness, founded in 2017 with a workforce of over 200 employees and a stated production capacity exceeding 3 GW, is exclusively a battery energy storage system (BESS) manufacturer specializing in LiFePO4 chemistry - it does not produce solar panels. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, employing over 33,800 people, listed on the NYSE, holding Tier 1 bankable status, and operating at a production capacity of 130 GW. These are complementary rather than competing companies within a complete solar-plus-storage system.

Jinko Solar's strength lies in its extensive and technologically advanced module portfolio of 545 products, headlined by the Tiger Neo series using N-type TOPCon cells. Maximum module power reaches 735 Wp with efficiencies up to 24.8%, and the average temperature coefficient of Pmax sits at -0.308%/°C, supporting reliable output in warmer climates. With 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer and over 300 GW installed globally, Jinko is well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays alike. Dyness, by contrast, addresses the energy storage side of installations: its Tower and PowerBrick series offer modular LiFePO4 systems with over 6,000 charge cycles at 80% DoD, round-trip efficiency above 95%, broad inverter compatibility (Solis, SMA, Sungrow, Victron), and a 10-year warranty, positioning it as a value-oriented option for hybrid solar systems.

For international buyers or installers selecting between the two, the choice is not either-or but rather about system design: Jinko Solar is a low-risk, bankable choice for the PV generation component, backed by decades of manufacturing scale and independent testing validation. Dyness fills the storage role at a competitive price point, though with more limited third-party track record and mixed customer reviews compared to premium BESS brands. A well-designed residential or C&I system could reasonably incorporate both - Jinko modules for generation and Dyness batteries for storage - rather than treating them as alternatives.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Dyness vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Dyness vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Dyness vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-jinko-solar