--- title: "Dyness vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Dyness vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-hyundai" --- # Dyness vs Hyundai Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Dyness | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | South Korea | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Seongnam-si | | Founded | 2017 | 2004 | | Employees | 200+ | 206 | | Annual capacity | 3+ GW/year | 1.35 GW/year | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | | Website | [https://www.dynesspower.com](https://www.dynesspower.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+... HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Dyness | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 65 | +65 | | Max Power | 0 W | 640 W | +640 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 442 W | +442 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Dyness | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 23.40% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.49% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Dyness | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Dyness | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | Dyness | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 8 (12.3%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) | Technology | Dyness | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Dyness is a Chinese energy storage manufacturer headquartered in Xi'an, founded around 2017, that has built its reputation around lithium iron phosphate battery systems rather than solar panels. It does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 solar module list, which is consistent with its identity as a battery-first company. Hyundai Energy Solutions, by contrast, is a South Korean photovoltaic module manufacturer operating under the HD Hyundai Group - a Fortune Global 500 conglomerate - with roots in solar production dating to 2004. HD Hyundai has achieved PVEL Top Performer recognition and holds a credible institutional footprint in the residential and commercial PV markets globally, giving it a substantially stronger standing as a panel brand. Because Dyness does not manufacture solar panels, a direct module-to-module product comparison is not possible. Dyness's catalog centers on home and commercial battery storage systems - the PowerBox, Stack100 Pro, and Cygni all-in-one ESS - making it a complementary component supplier rather than a panel competitor. Hyundai Energy Solutions, on the other hand, offers a genuine panel lineup anchored by its NF(BK) series, which uses confirmed N-Type TOPCon cell technology and achieves module efficiencies that independent sources cite at up to roughly 22-23%. The panels are bifacial-capable, carry a 25-year product and performance warranty, and are positioned toward value-conscious residential and light commercial rooftop buyers who want above-average efficiency without flagship pricing. For a buyer specifically shopping for solar panels in 2025, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the clear and only applicable choice between these two brands. Dyness may be worth evaluating as a battery storage partner alongside whichever panel brand is selected, since its LiFePO4 systems are distributed in markets such as Australia, Europe, and the US - but comparing it to Hyundai as a panel manufacturer is a category mismatch. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article \- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Hyundai Solar Panels - The Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/reviews/dyness-review.html \| Dyness Solar Battery Storage Review - SolarQuotes \| review Sources: \- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels in 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels) \- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells - PV Magazine USA\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/) \- \[Hyundai Solar Panels - The Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/) \- \[Dyness Solar Battery Storage Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/reviews/dyness-review.html) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Dyness vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai) - [Dyness vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai) - [Dyness vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/dyness-vs-hyundai