---
title: "DMEGC vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DMEGC vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-yingli"
---

# DMEGC vs Yingli

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 150 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. DMEGC leans bifacial (73% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DMEGC | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Dongyang, Zhejiang Province | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 1980 | 1998 |
| Employees | 18,831 | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 21 GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shenzhen Stock Exchange: SZ: 002056 | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [https://www.dmegcsolar.com](https://www.dmegcsolar.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

DMEGC Solar, founded in 1980, is a global provider of renewable energy solutions, specializing in high-efficiency solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. The company has six manufacturing bases and is known for its integrated supply chain, from wafers to modules. DMEGC Solar is committed...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DMEGC | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 196 | +46 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 735 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 476 W | 524 W | +48 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DMEGC | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.10% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.39% | 21.28% | +0.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DMEGC | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.039 |
| Bifacial Share | 109 (73%) | 112 (57%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DMEGC skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DMEGC | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 24 (16.0%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (2.7%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 11 (7.3%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 79 (52.7%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 32 (21.3%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | DMEGC | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 19 (12.7%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 89 (59.3%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 23 (15.3%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 14 (9.3%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (3.3%) | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | DMEGC | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 109 (72.7%) | 54 (27.6%) |
| N-type | 41 (27.3%) | 59 (30.1%) |
| PERC | 0 | 63 (32.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (10.2%) |


## Top panels, DMEGC


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DM720G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm720g12t-b66hsw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DM715G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm715g12t-b66hsw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DM710G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm710g12t-b66hsw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DM705G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm705g12t-b66hsw) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DM700G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm700g12t-b66hsw) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DM695G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm695g12t-b66hsw) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DM650M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm650m10t-b78hsw) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DM645M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm645m10t-b78hsw) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DM640M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm640m10t-b78hsw) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DM635G12RT-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/hengdian-group-dmegc-magnetics-co-ltd-dm635g12rt-b66hsw) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DMEGC Solar is a Chinese manufacturer that has grown into a top-ten global module producer, holding Tier 1 status on both the BloombergNEF Global PV Module Manufacturer Ranking and the S&P Global supplier list as of 2025. The company closed 2025 with module production capacity of 21 GW and cell capacity of 23 GW, and its full-year 2025 shipments reached nearly 25 GW - a year-on-year increase of more than 45 percent - supported by five factories in China and one in Indonesia. Yingli Solar carries a very different trajectory: founded in 1998 in Baoding, China, it was once the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by volume in 2012 and 2013, before a prolonged financial crisis between 2015 and 2020 forced a major restructuring. The company has since recovered, regaining Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status and reporting approximately 20 GW of shipments in 2024, though by 2025 it ranked around tenth globally with roughly 3 percent market share. On overall institutional footprint and growth momentum, DMEGC currently holds a clear advantage.

DMEGC's flagship Infinity RT series is built on TOPCon cell technology, reaching 23.5 percent module efficiency at 635 W by late 2025 and earning recognition in the TaiyangNews monthly top-module rankings. The line is a strong fit for commercial rooftop, C&I, and utility-scale ground-mount projects where yield per square meter is a priority. Yingli's current portfolio is anchored by the PANDA 3.0 PRO, a bifacial TOPCon module rated at 625 W and 22.36 percent efficiency. The company also continues to offer PERC-based products, keeping it competitive across a wider price range. Yingli modules were deployed in large-scale European renewable energy projects as recently as 2024, confirming ongoing acceptance by project-finance lenders.

For most international buyers - whether sourcing for distributed rooftop installations or utility tenders - DMEGC is the more straightforward default, given its larger manufacturing scale, stronger growth trajectory, and dual bankability recognition. Yingli is a credible and technically solid alternative, especially where price sensitivity or brand heritage matters, but its restructuring history can invite additional scrutiny from insurers and lenders on complex project-finance deals. Where institutional bankability requirements are not stringent, the two manufacturers are broadly interchangeable on technical merit; when long-term financial assurance is paramount, DMEGC carries the clearer edge.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DMEGC vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [DMEGC vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [DMEGC vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.