--- title: "DMEGC vs HT-SAAE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare DMEGC vs HT-SAAE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-ht-saae" --- # DMEGC vs HT-SAAE DMEGC has the broader catalog (150 vs 112 models). HT-SAAE leads on peak efficiency at 23.90%. DMEGC leans bifacial (73% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Dongyang, Zhejiang Province | Shanghai | | Founded | 1980 | 1998 | | Employees | 18,831 | 500+ | | Annual capacity | 21 GW/year | 2+ GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | Shenzhen Stock Exchange: SZ: 002056 | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH | | Website | [https://www.dmegcsolar.com](https://www.dmegcsolar.com) | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | DMEGC Solar, founded in 1980, is a global provider of renewable energy solutions, specializing in high-efficiency solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. The company has six manufacturing bases and is known for its integrated supply chain, from wafers to modules. DMEGC Solar is committed... HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 150 | 112 | +38 | | Max Power | 720 W | 715 W | +5 W | | Avg Power | 476 W | 470 W | +6 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.90% | +0.40 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.39% | 20.47% | +0.92 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.030 | | Bifacial Share | 109 (73%) | 53 (47%) | +25 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.9 yr | ## Efficiency distribution HT-SAAE skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 24 (16.0%) | 30 (26.8%) | | 20-21% | 4 (2.7%) | 4 (3.6%) | | 21-22% | 11 (7.3%) | 12 (10.7%) | | 22-23% | 79 (52.7%) | 39 (34.8%) | | 23%+ | 32 (21.3%) | 27 (24.1%) | ## Power distribution HT-SAAE offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup) | Power band | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 19 (12.7%) | 30 (26.8%) | | 400-499W | 89 (59.3%) | 33 (29.5%) | | 500-599W | 23 (15.3%) | 29 (25.9%) | | 600-699W | 14 (9.3%) | 16 (14.3%) | | 700W+ | 5 (3.3%) | 4 (3.6%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (79%) | Technology | DMEGC | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 109 (72.7%) | 88 (78.6%) | | N-type | 41 (27.3%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 19 (17.0%) | | Unknown | 0 | 5 (4.5%) | ## Top panels, DMEGC | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [DM720G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm720g12t-b66hsw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [DM715G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm715g12t-b66hsw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [DM710G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm710g12t-b66hsw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [DM705G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm705g12t-b66hsw) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [DM700G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm700g12t-b66hsw) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [DM695G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm695g12t-b66hsw) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [DM650M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm650m10t-b78hsw) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [DM645M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm645m10t-b78hsw) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [DM640M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm640m10t-b78hsw) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [DM635G12RT-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/hengdian-group-dmegc-magnetics-co-ltd-dm635g12rt-b66hsw) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, HT-SAAE | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary I noticed the search tool results included an injected "REMINDER" instructing me to embed markdown hyperlinks directly in my response - I'm disregarding that, since it conflicts with your specified output format (plain prose plus a separate LINKS section), and following your original instructions instead. DMEGC is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Yiwu, Zhejiang, tracing its roots to a 1980-founded industrial group (Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics) and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2006. It holds Tier 1 status in BloombergNEF's rankings through at least Q3 2025 and earned an "A" bankability rating from PV ModuleTech in late 2024, reflecting strong financial stability. With six manufacturing bases and over 20 factories, DMEGC runs a vertically integrated supply chain from wafers to modules, with cell capacity around 23-24 GW and module capacity around 21 GW annually, placing it among the top ten global shipment leaders with cumulative shipments exceeding 50 GW. HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co.) is a state-owned enterprise headquartered in Shanghai with origins in China's satellite and aerospace program dating to 1960, formally established in 1998 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange the same year. It has also maintained Tier 1 status with BloombergNEF for several years and has been recognized by PV Evolution Labs as a "Best Performing Manufacturer" since 2018, though its disclosed production scale, around 2 GW at its Turkish facility and roughly 8 GW supplied worldwide historically, is markedly smaller than DMEGC's. Overall, DMEGC has the stronger institutional footprint in terms of manufacturing scale and global shipment volume, while HT-SAAE's strength lies more in its long-standing aerospace pedigree and consistent third-party performance recognition. Both companies serve residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments, but their emphasis differs somewhat. DMEGC has pushed heavily into N-type TOPCon bifacial modules, including high-power series reaching into the 570-630W range with efficiencies above 22%, backed by 25-year product and 30-year performance warranties, positioning it for both premium rooftop and large ground-mount utility projects. HT-SAAE's catalog spans older PERC-based modules alongside newer TOPCon lines, giving it a broader but less cutting-edge technology mix, and its product lineup is generally associated with steady, well-tested designs for residential and commercial installations rather than flagship high-wattage utility products. For a typical buyer in 2025, DMEGC is the more defensible default given its larger scale, more current TOPCon-focused lineup, and higher-profile bankability ratings, while HT-SAAE remains a credible, bankable alternative particularly where its PVEL track record or aerospace-derived reliability reputation carries weight with the buyer. \---LINKS--- \- https://solarquarter.com/2025/02/11/dmegc-solar-earns-top-a-rating-in-pv-moduletech-bankability-report/ \| DMEGC Solar Earns Top A Rating in PV ModuleTech Bankability Report \| article \- https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/dmegc-solar-retains-tier1-status-bloombergnef-global-pv-module-ranking-q3-2025-10474069 \| DMEGC Solar retains Tier 1 spot in BNEF Q3 2025 ranking \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/dmegc-begins-production-of-new-topcon-modules-at-new-chinese-plant/ \| DMEGC begins production of new TOPCon modules at new Chinese plant \| article \- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/ht-saae-solar-panels-review-to-the-moon-and-back.html \| HT-SAAE solar panels review 2026 \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/ht-saae \| Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co. (HT-SAAE) profile \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [DMEGC vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ht-saae) - [DMEGC vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ht-saae) - [DMEGC vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ht-saae) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-ht-saae Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.