---
title: "DMEGC vs GCL - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DMEGC vs GCL solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-gcl"
---

# DMEGC vs GCL

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 150 models). GCL leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | DMEGC | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Dongyang, Zhejiang Province | Suzhou/Hong Kong |
| Founded | 1980 | 1990 |
| Employees | 18,831 | 6000+ |
| Annual capacity | 21 GW/year | 30+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shenzhen Stock Exchange: SZ: 002056 | Hong Kong Stock Exchange/Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 03800.HK/002506.SZ |
| Website | [https://www.dmegcsolar.com](https://www.dmegcsolar.com) | [http://www.gcltech.com/](http://www.gcltech.com/) |

DMEGC Solar, founded in 1980, is a global provider of renewable energy solutions, specializing in high-efficiency solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. The company has six manufacturing bases and is known for its integrated supply chain, from wafers to modules. DMEGC Solar is committed...

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DMEGC | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 232 | +82 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 740 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 476 W | 558 W | +83 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DMEGC | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.50% | +1.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.39% | 22.03% | +0.64 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DMEGC | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.320%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 109 (73%) | 151 (65%) | +8 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DMEGC | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 24 (16.0%) | 2 (0.9%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (2.7%) | 43 (18.5%) |
| 21-22% | 11 (7.3%) | 73 (31.5%) |
| 22-23% | 79 (52.7%) | 48 (20.7%) |
| 23%+ | 32 (21.3%) | 66 (28.4%) |


## Power distribution

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | DMEGC | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 19 (12.7%) | 6 (2.6%) |
| 400-499W | 89 (59.3%) | 60 (25.9%) |
| 500-599W | 23 (15.3%) | 63 (27.2%) |
| 600-699W | 14 (9.3%) | 81 (34.9%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (3.3%) | 22 (9.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)


| Technology | DMEGC | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 109 (72.7%) | 108 (46.6%) |
| N-type | 41 (27.3%) | 10 (4.3%) |
| PERC | 0 | 102 (44.0%) |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (3.0%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (2.2%) |


## Top panels, DMEGC


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DM720G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm720g12t-b66hsw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DM715G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm715g12t-b66hsw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DM710G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm710g12t-b66hsw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DM705G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm705g12t-b66hsw) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DM700G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm700g12t-b66hsw) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DM695G12T-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm695g12t-b66hsw) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DM650M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm650m10t-b78hsw) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DM645M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm645m10t-b78hsw) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DM640M10T-B78HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/dmegc-hengdian-group-dm640m10t-b78hsw) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DM635G12RT-B66HSW](https://comparepv.com/panel/hengdian-group-dmegc-magnetics-co-ltd-dm635g12rt-b66hsw) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, GCL


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF 725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725-1) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GCL-NH12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nh12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DMEGC is a Chinese solar manufacturer operating as part of DMEGC Group, an industrial conglomerate with origins in the magnetics sector dating back to the 1980s. The solar division has expanded sharply in recent years, reaching a production capacity of 23 GW for cells and 21 GW for modules by the end of 2025, with full-year shipments of approximately 24.92 GW - a 45% year-on-year increase. DMEGC holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and was included in S&P Global Commodity Insights' inaugural Tier 1 PV Module Supplier list in 2025, underpinning solid bankability with financiers. GCL - formally GCL Technology Holdings, with modules produced through its GCL System Integration arm - was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. The group built its foundation as one of the world's dominant polysilicon and wafer producers before extending into full module manufacturing, giving it a degree of vertical integration that few peers can match. GCL-SI carries a stated module capacity of around 30 GW and ranked seventh globally in module shipments in 2025. Bankability assessments for the module division vary across rating agencies, though the group's supply-chain depth lends it considerable institutional weight overall - an area where GCL has the structural edge over DMEGC.

On the product side, DMEGC's current lineup centers on TOPCon technology, covering bifacial utility-scale ground-mount modules as well as lightweight bifacial TOPCon panels engineered for residential rooftops with restricted load-bearing capacity. The premium Infinity RT series reaches 23.5% efficiency at 635 W. GCL-SI has similarly pivoted its latest product generations to TOPCon, with the ASTRO N7 module achieving 23.3% efficiency. GCL also retains Cast-Mono offerings in its catalog and is actively developing perovskite cells for future generations, reflecting its identity as a materials-first innovator rather than a pure module assembler.

For a typical international buyer - whether sourcing for a residential rooftop, a commercial C&I system, or a utility-scale array - both brands operate at comparable scale, deliver modern TOPCon technology, and carry credible industry recognition. DMEGC's S&P Global Tier 1 designation and shipment growth trajectory make it a straightforward choice for risk-averse project financiers, while GCL's unrivaled vertical integration offers meaningful supply-chain resilience. In most procurement contexts the two are effectively interchangeable, and the deciding factor will generally come down to regional distributor availability and unit pricing rather than any fundamental gap in product quality.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DMEGC vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-gcl)
- [DMEGC vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-gcl)
- [DMEGC vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-gcl)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dmegc-vs-gcl

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.