---
title: "Deye vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Deye vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-hyundai"
---

# Deye vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Deye | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Ningbo | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 1990 | 2004 |
| Employees | 5000-10000 | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 5+ GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 605117:SHH | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [http://www.deye.com.cn/](http://www.deye.com.cn/) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

Ningbo Deye Technology Co., Ltd. is a comprehensive technology manufacturing enterprise integrating R&D, design, production, sales, and service. The company has four core industrial chains: solar inverter systems, solar air conditioner systems, solar energy storage batteries, and dehumidifiers. Deye's products are...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Deye | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 65 | +65 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 640 W | +640 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 442 W | +442 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Deye | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.40% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.49% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Deye | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Deye | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | Deye | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Deye | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I now have enough to write an accurate comparison.

Deye is a Chinese company, founded in 2007 as Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2021, that built its global reputation primarily as one of China's top three manufacturers of solar inverters and energy storage systems, competing directly with Huawei and Sungrow, with products sold in over 140 countries. Its core business is string, hybrid, off-grid and micro inverters rather than solar modules, and available research turned up no independent reviews or BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing for Deye-branded solar panels specifically, so its standing as a panel manufacturer cannot be confirmed with the same confidence as its inverter business. Hyundai, through its HD Hyundai Energy Solutions division, has a longer and more specialized module-manufacturing history, tracing its solar business back to 2004-2005 as Korea's first major solar manufacturer, and it holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status along with roughly 1.4 GW of annual production capacity. On institutional footprint specifically for panel manufacturing, Hyundai has the clearer and better-documented position.

Hyundai's current flagship residential product line, the TNC 2.0 series, uses N-type TOPCon cell technology and includes high-efficiency modules rated above 640W, positioning the brand for premium residential and commercial rooftops, backed by a 25-year product and performance warranty; it competes technologically with the likes of Jinko and JA Solar, though its efficiency and warranty terms trail those market leaders slightly. Deye, by contrast, is typically specified alongside third-party panels rather than as the panel brand itself, and is generally chosen by installers and DIY solar builders for its hybrid and off-grid inverters, energy storage integration and value-oriented residential and commercial systems, with reported inverter efficiencies around 98 percent.

For a typical buyer evaluating solar panels specifically, Hyundai is the stronger, better-documented choice given its confirmed Tier 1 bankability and TOPCon-based module lineup, while Deye is generally a better fit for buyers assembling a system around its inverter and storage hardware rather than sourcing panels from the brand. The two are not directly interchangeable since they occupy different primary roles in a typical solar installation.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025 \| review

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of TOPCon cells \| article

\- https://www.solarinfo.uk/solar-panel-brands/hyundai-solar \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review UK: TNC 2.0 Specs and Performance \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/10/deye-debuts-off-grid-inverters-for-residential-pv/ \| Deye debuts off-grid inverters for residential PV \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/inverters/deye-review.html \| Deye Solar Inverters Review \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Deye vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [Deye vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [Deye vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-hyundai