--- title: "Deye vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Deye vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-akcome" --- # Deye vs AKCOME AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Deye | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Ningbo | Suzhou | | Founded | 1990 | 2003 | | Employees | 5000-10000 | | | Annual capacity | 5+ GW/year | | | Tier 1 | | no | | Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 605117:SHH | | | Website | [http://www.deye.com.cn/](http://www.deye.com.cn/) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | Ningbo Deye Technology Co., Ltd. is a comprehensive technology manufacturing enterprise integrating R&D, design, production, sales, and service. The company has four core industrial chains: solar inverter systems, solar air conditioner systems, solar energy storage batteries, and dehumidifiers. Deye's products are... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Deye | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 3 | +3 | | Max Power | 0 W | 700 W | +700 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 672 W | +672 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Deye | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 22.54% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.63% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Deye | AKCOME | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.240%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | +100 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Deye | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 0 | 2 (66.7%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | Deye | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) | Technology | Deye | AKCOME | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary This confirms enough for a grounded, hedged comparison. I have sufficient sourced material on both brands' positioning. AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu, part of the Jiangsu Akcome Industrial Group, and has been recognized as a Tier 1 PV module manufacturer under BloombergNEF's bankability rankings. Historical data puts its module and cell capacity at roughly 9.4 GW and 8.27 GW respectively as of 2022, with cumulative shipments reported around 18 GW. Deye, by contrast, traces its roots to Deye Technology Group founded in 1990, with the inverter-focused subsidiary Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology established in 2007; the group listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2021 (605117.SH) and is generally described as one of the top three Chinese manufacturers of solar inverters and energy storage systems, with inverter and ESS production capacity cited at around 20 GW. AKCOME's institutional footprint centers specifically on module manufacturing and BloombergNEF-verified bankability, while Deye's stronger and more established position is in the inverter and battery storage segment rather than panel production itself. AKCOME's module lineup spans standard, high-efficiency, double-glass, and premium "Kookaburra" series, with recent products in the 655W to 730W range built on N-type TOPCon and HJT cell technology; the AK iTopper 580W TOPCon module is positioned for commercial and residential rooftops, while the higher-efficiency AK iPower 730W HJT module targets large-scale utility ground-mount installations. Deye's core business is grid-tie, off-grid, and hybrid inverters (roughly 1.5 kW to 50 kW) plus microinverters and residential all-in-one energy storage systems, and while the brand also distributes PV panels rated from about 420W to 750W through partner channels, its market reputation and product depth lie predominantly in power electronics and storage rather than in cell or module technology. For a buyer specifically shopping for solar panels, AKCOME is the more directly comparable and better-documented choice, given its confirmed Tier 1 module manufacturing status and dedicated cell technology roadmap. Deye is best understood as a complementary rather than competing brand in this category - it is generally the stronger and more established name for inverters and battery storage, and any panels sold under its name are typically a smaller part of a broader hybrid-system offering rather than its core manufacturing strength. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/inverters/deye-review.html \| Deye Solar Inverters Independent Review \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/deye-inverter \| Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology Co., Ltd. company profile \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Deye vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome) - [Deye vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome) - [Deye vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/deye-vs-akcome