---
title: "Daxieworld vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Daxieworld vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Daxieworld vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 17 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Daxieworld | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Daxieworld | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 17 | 340 | +323 |
| Max Power | 535 W | 760 W | +225 W |
| Avg Power | 466 W | 520 W | +54 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Daxieworld | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.61% | 24.80% | +3.19 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.47% | 21.71% | +2.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Daxieworld | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.372%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.070 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Daxieworld | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (88.2%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (5.9%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 1 (5.9%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Daxieworld | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (11.8%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 10 (58.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (29.4%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (59%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Daxieworld | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 10 (58.8%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Flexible | 7 (41.2%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Daxieworld


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AOX-144M10FL 535W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-535w) | 535 | 20.1 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AOX-144M10FL 530W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-530w) | 530 | 19.9 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AOX-144M10FL 525W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w) | 525 | 19.7 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AOX-144M10FL 520W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w) | 520 | 19.5 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DX500W-30M](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-dx500w-30m) | 500 | 21.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AOX-132M10FL 485W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w) | 485 | 19.8 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AOX-132M10FL 480W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-480w) | 480 | 19.6 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AOX-132M10FL 475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-475w) | 475 | 19.4 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AOX-132M10FL 470W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w) | 470 | 19.2 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AOX-132M10FL 465W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-465w) | 465 | 19.0 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Daxieworld is a small Chinese manufacturer operating under the legal name Shenzhen Daxie Technology Co., Ltd, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. With a reported workforce of around 100 employees and a factory footprint of approximately 3,000 square meters, it is a niche supplier rather than a vertically integrated industrial producer. No credible industry source places Daxieworld on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list or any comparable bankability ranking. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in Changzhou, China in 1997 by Jifan Gao and has grown into one of the top five global module manufacturers, reporting over 50 GW of annual production capacity and cumulative shipments exceeding 225 GW by early 2025. Trina holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as of Q1 2025, has achieved Top Performer recognition from PVEL for 11 consecutive years, and reported revenues of approximately US$11.3 billion in 2024. In terms of institutional footprint and bankability, Trina Solar operates in an entirely different category.

Daxieworld's catalog, as listed in the ENF Solar directory, covers a broad range of formats including rigid mono and polycrystalline panels from roughly 280 W to 600 W, flexible ETFE panels suited to RVs, boats, and portable off-grid setups, and N-type TOPCon modules in the 580-600 W range. This breadth suggests a strategy focused on niche and small-scale applications rather than utility-scale or large commercial deployments. Trina Solar addresses a much wider spectrum: its Vertex S and Vertex S+ lines - built around n-type i-TOPCon cell technology - serve residential rooftops and commercial C&I installations, while the larger Vertex series targets utility-scale ground-mount projects across more than 160 countries. Vertex S+ G3 modules carry a 30-year linear performance warranty and have been extensively validated in third-party reliability testing.

For any buyer where bankability, long-term warranty coverage, and broad installer support are priorities - which describes the vast majority of residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects - Trina Solar is the clear default choice. Daxieworld may be a reasonable option for cost-sensitive off-grid or portable applications where institutional backing is less critical, but the two brands are not interchangeable for mainstream grid-tied solar installations.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Daxieworld vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Daxieworld vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Daxieworld vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.