---
title: "Daxieworld vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Daxieworld vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Daxieworld vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 17 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Daxieworld | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Beijing |
| Founded |  | 2005 |
| Employees |  | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity |  | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website |  | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Daxieworld | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 17 | 504 | +487 |
| Max Power | 535 W | 740 W | +205 W |
| Avg Power | 466 W | 456 W | +10 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Daxieworld | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.61% | 24.80% | +3.19 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.47% | 21.13% | +1.66 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Daxieworld | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.372%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.050 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 238 (47%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Daxieworld | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (88.2%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (5.9%) | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 1 (5.9%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 74 (14.7%) |


## Power distribution

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)


| Power band | Daxieworld | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (11.8%) | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 10 (58.8%) | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (29.4%) | 120 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (59%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Daxieworld | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 10 (58.8%) | 247 (49.0%) |
| Flexible | 7 (41.2%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 146 (29.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 90 (17.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 16 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (1.0%) |


## Top panels, Daxieworld


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AOX-144M10FL 535W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-535w) | 535 | 20.1 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AOX-144M10FL 530W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-530w) | 530 | 19.9 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AOX-144M10FL 525W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-525w) | 525 | 19.7 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AOX-144M10FL 520W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-144m10fl-520w) | 520 | 19.5 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DX500W-30M](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-dx500w-30m) | 500 | 21.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AOX-132M10FL 485W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-485w) | 485 | 19.8 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AOX-132M10FL 480W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-480w) | 480 | 19.6 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AOX-132M10FL 475W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-475w) | 475 | 19.4 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AOX-132M10FL 470W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-470w) | 470 | 19.2 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AOX-132M10FL 465W](https://comparepv.com/panel/daxieworld-aox-132m10fl-465w) | 465 | 19.0 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Daxieworld (the commercial brand of Shenzhen Daxie Technology Co., Ltd) and JA Solar represent vastly different tiers of the global solar manufacturing landscape. Daxieworld is a small Shenzhen-based producer focused exclusively on flexible photovoltaic modules - it is not Tier 1 bankable, fields a portfolio of only 17 panels, reaches a maximum output of 535 Wp, and delivers an average module efficiency of 19.47% with a temperature coefficient of -0.37%/°C. None of its products are bifacial. JA Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2005, employs over 37,000 people, and has built a production capacity exceeding 100 GW. It holds Tier 1 bankable status confirmed by both S&P Global Commodity Insights and BloombergNEF, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and jointly topped Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for the first half of 2025 alongside Trina Solar.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 panels spans PERC (roughly 52% of the lineup) and TOPCon technologies, with a maximum module power of 740 Wp, an average efficiency of 20.87%, a temperature coefficient of -0.32%/°C, and 44.27% of products offering bifacial capability. Average warranty coverage approaches 28 years. This breadth makes JA Solar suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays alike. Daxieworld's flexible ETFE and CIGS modules serve a narrow but real niche - vehicles, RVs, marine applications, and curved or unconventional mounting surfaces where rigid crystalline panels cannot be used.

For most international buyers evaluating standard rooftop or ground-mount projects, JA Solar is the clear choice given its bankability, extensive independent testing validation (PVEL Top Performer status), superior temperature coefficient, longer warranty, and deep product variety. Daxieworld is a viable option only where flexible, lightweight modules are a genuine technical requirement rather than a preference.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Daxieworld vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Daxieworld vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Daxieworld vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/daxieworld-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.