---
title: "DAS Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAS Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# DAS Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 97 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. DAS Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Quzhou, Zhejiang | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2018 | 1997 |
| Employees | 500+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 40-50 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.das-solar.com](https://www.das-solar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

DAS Solar, founded in 2018, specializes in the development, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency solar cells and photovoltaic modules. The company is committed to providing integrated PV new energy system solutions. DAS Solar is recognized as a global high-tech enterprise and a leader in N-type photovoltaic...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 97 | 340 | +243 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 528 W | 520 W | +8 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 24.80% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.95% | 21.71% | +0.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 73 (75%) | 145 (43%) | +33 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.2%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 8 (8.2%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (26.8%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 42 (43.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 14 (14.4%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | DAS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 46 (47.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 28 (28.9%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 19 (19.6%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (4.1%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | DAS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 74 (76.3%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 23 (23.7%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, DAS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH156NA-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-650w) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DAS-DH132NE-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH156NA-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-645w) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DAS-DH132NE-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-645w) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH156NA-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-640w) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAS Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Quzhou, Zhejiang, founded in August 2018. Despite its short operating history, it secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition in all four quarters of 2025, reports a production capacity of approximately 25 GW, and shipped 10 GWp of modules in the first half of 2025 alone. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 by Jifan Gao and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is one of the photovoltaic industry's most established global players, having shipped over 292 GW cumulatively by mid-2025 and earning a 100% BNEF bankability rating for the eighth time - a milestone no other manufacturer has equalled as consistently. On the combined strength of its longevity, cumulative shipment volume, and depth of third-party validation, Trina Solar holds the stronger institutional footprint.

DAS Solar has built its product identity almost entirely around N-type TOPCon technology, which it was among the first manufacturers in China to commercialize at industrial scale. Its portfolio spans residential rooftops, commercial and industrial installations, floating PV, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with lightweight formats for urban applications and reinforced variants for desert or coastal conditions. The company's proprietary research framework - integrating back-contact, TSiP, and SFOS cell architectures alongside core TOPCon - signals an ambitious efficiency roadmap beyond current-generation modules. Trina Solar's catalog is anchored by the Vertex N series, based on i-TOPCon Ultra cells and 210 mm wafers, with bifacial utility-scale modules reaching up to 760 W and suited for large tracker-based ground-mount systems. The Vertex S+ line addresses commercial rooftops and residential customers in compact formats up to 485 W, including a full-black aesthetic option and a hail-resistant Shield variant for markets with demanding weather profiles.

For buyers financing large utility-scale projects where lender acceptance is a deciding factor, Trina Solar is the more conservative and bankable default: eight years of unanimous BNEF ratings, eleven consecutive Kiwa PVEL TOP Performer awards, and a TÜV Rheinland AA-rated supply chain traceability certification represent a body of third-party evidence that DAS Solar has simply not yet had time to accumulate. DAS Solar is a credible and fast-growing challenger well suited to buyers prioritizing a cutting-edge TOPCon technology pipeline. For residential and smaller commercial purchases, the technical gap between the two is narrow, and practical considerations such as local distributor coverage and warranty terms are likely to carry more weight than brand tier alone.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAS Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [DAS Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [DAS Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.