---
title: "DAS Solar vs Jetion - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAS Solar vs Jetion solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-jetion"
---

# DAS Solar vs Jetion

DAS Solar has the broader catalog (97 vs 95 models). Jetion leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. Jetion leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAS Solar | Jetion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Quzhou, Zhejiang | Jiangyin, Wuxi, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 2018 | 2004 |
| Employees | 500+ | 1500-3000 |
| Annual capacity | 40-50 GW/year | 2.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.das-solar.com](https://www.das-solar.com) | [http://www.jetionsolar.com](http://www.jetionsolar.com) |

DAS Solar, founded in 2018, specializes in the development, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency solar cells and photovoltaic modules. The company is committed to providing integrated PV new energy system solutions. DAS Solar is recognized as a global high-tech enterprise and a leader in N-type photovoltaic...

Jetion Solar specializes in the research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant accomplishments in terms of production capacity and innovative designs. Jetion Solar joined CNBM (China National Building Materials Group Corporation) in 2014.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAS Solar | Jetion | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 97 | 95 | +2 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 800 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 528 W | 583 W | +56 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAS Solar | Jetion | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 24.30% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.95% | 22.61% | +0.65 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAS Solar | Jetion | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.274%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 73 (75%) | 87 (92%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 29.3 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jetion skews to higher efficiency: 34% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAS Solar | Jetion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 8 (8.2%) | 1 (1.1%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (26.8%) | 17 (17.9%) |
| 22-23% | 42 (43.3%) | 45 (47.4%) |
| 23%+ | 14 (14.4%) | 32 (33.7%) |


## Power distribution

Jetion offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | DAS Solar | Jetion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 46 (47.4%) | 26 (27.4%) |
| 500-599W | 28 (28.9%) | 27 (28.4%) |
| 600-699W | 19 (19.6%) | 20 (21.1%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (4.1%) | 22 (23.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (76%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (60%)


| Technology | DAS Solar | Jetion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 74 (76.3%) | 57 (60.0%) |
| PERC | 23 (23.7%) | 3 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 35 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, DAS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DAS-DH132NC-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132nc-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH156NA-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-650w) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DAS-DH132NE-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-650w) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH156NA-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-645w) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DAS-DH132NE-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh132ne-645w) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH156NA-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/das-solar-das-dh156na-640w) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jetion


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JT800SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt800sxt-b) | 800 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JT795SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt795sxt-b) | 795 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JT790SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt790sxt-b) | 790 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JT785SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt785sxt-b) | 785 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JT780SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt780sxt-b) | 780 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JT775SXt(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt775sxt-b) | 775 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JT755SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt755slk-b) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JT750SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt750slk-b) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JT745SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt745slk-b) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JT740SLk(B)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jetion-jt740slk-b) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [DAS Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jetion](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jetion)
- [DAS Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jetion](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jetion)
- [DAS Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jetion](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jetion)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/das-solar-vs-jetion

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.