---
title: "DAON vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAON vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/daon-vs-akcome"
---

# DAON vs AKCOME

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAON | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Suzhou |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAON | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 3 | +3 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 700 W | +700 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 672 W | +672 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAON | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 22.54% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.63% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAON | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.240%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | DAON | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | DAON | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | DAON | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAON is a Chinese solar module brand that occupies a relatively niche position in the global market. According to the ComparePV database, DAON produces a compact range of N-type TOPCon panels in the 410W to 430W class, with a fully bifacial portfolio and a 30-year performance warranty. The brand appears to have entered the market around 2018 and has limited independently documented history on major industry tracking lists such as BloombergNEF's Tier 1 register, which means it does not yet carry the institutional bankability recognition that project lenders typically require.

AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) was founded in 2006 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2011, giving it a significantly longer and more transparent public record. Headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, the company has built a reputation as a dedicated heterojunction technology specialist, with its current catalog centered on HJT bifacial modules in the 655W to 700W range, efficiency reaching up to 22.5% on top models according to ComparePV. AKCOME reached BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as of 2022, although it was noted to have dropped from active tracking in early 2025 due to website accessibility issues rather than a fundamental change in its manufacturing standing. The company operates solar farms across Asia Pacific totaling over 1.5 GW and distributes through a network spanning more than 80 countries, giving it a meaningfully broader institutional footprint than DAON.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME is the stronger default choice of the two. Its longer track record, established HJT platform, and prior bankability recognition make it a lower-risk procurement option for commercial and utility-scale projects. DAON's TOPCon offering may suit budget-conscious or residential buyers where Tier 1 project financing requirements are not a factor, but the comparative lack of independent third-party documentation warrants caution for larger deployments.

\---LINKS---

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/daon \| DAON Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules Profile \| article

Sources:

\- \[DAON Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs \| ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/daon)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome)

\- \[Akcome \| Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels - hjtpv.com - HJT PV Modules\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/)

\- \[TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing - January 2025 - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025)

\- \[History - About US - Jiangsu AKCOME Science and Technology Co., Ltd.\](https://en.akcome.com/course)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAON vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/daon-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [DAON vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/daon-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [DAON vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/daon-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/daon-vs-akcome

