---
title: "DAH vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-znshine"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/dah/znshine.png"
---

# DAH vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 0 models). ZNShine leans bifacial (42% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Suqian |
| Founded | 2009 | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.dahsolarpv.com](https://www.dahsolarpv.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 212 | +212 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 670 W | +670 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 535 W | +535 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 22.83% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.35% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.329%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 89 (42%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.3 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | DAH | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 47 (22.2%) |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 43 (20.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)


| Technology | DAH | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 78 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar, founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, has grown into a Tier 1 bankable manufacturer with a 10 GW module production capacity and a focus on high-efficiency innovation - most notably its patented Full-Screen module design, which removes the front frame to reduce shading losses and dust accumulation. The company's portfolio of 356 panels is heavily weighted toward TOPCon cell technology (81.2% of panels), with a maximum module efficiency of 23.34% and a portfolio average of 22.13%. DAH Solar has established a meaningful European footprint through a distribution warehouse in Rotterdam and a branch office in Frankfurt, with documented commercial activity in Poland, Germany, Austria, and Italy, and it has maintained its position on the BNEF Tier 1 list into 2025. ZNShine Solar traces its origins to 1988 and has been manufacturing PV modules since 2006, positioning itself as one of the more established Chinese solar brands. Listed on China's NEEQ exchange with approximately 1,200 employees and a stated production capacity of 10 GW, ZNShine carries a 212-panel portfolio led by PERC cell technology (63.2%), reaching a maximum efficiency of 22.83% and a portfolio average of 21.35%. It also holds Tier 1 bankable status according to BNEF.

DAH Solar's primary strength lies in its high-efficiency TOPCon lineup combined with an exceptionally high bifacial share of 88.8% across its portfolio and a more favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C, making it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects seeking maximum energy yield as well as residential rooftop installs where the Full-Screen design and an average warranty of ~29.5 years add long-term value. ZNShine's competitive edge rests on a higher average panel output (~534.5 Wp versus ~521.8 Wp for DAH Solar), which can reduce the total panel count in commercial C&I and large ground-mount projects and lower balance-of-system costs. ZNShine panels have been noted for strong performance in low-irradiance conditions and have recorded top results in independent stress and durability tests. That said, ZNShine's bifacial share stands at only 42.0% and its average temperature coefficient of -0.329%/°C is less favorable, and its dominant PERC technology is increasingly being superseded by TOPCon industry-wide.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar is the stronger option when efficiency leadership, bifacial performance, and technology trajectory matter - particularly for residential rooftop and premium utility-scale segments. ZNShine is a credible alternative for high-volume EPC procurement where competitive pricing on proven PERC modules and a long manufacturing track record carry more weight than cutting-edge cell technology.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [DAH vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [DAH vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-znshine