---
title: "DAH vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-yingli"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/dah/yingli.png"
---

# DAH vs Yingli

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 0 models). Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 2009 | 1998 |
| Employees |  | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [https://www.dahsolarpv.com](https://www.dahsolarpv.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 196 | +196 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 524 W | +524 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.10% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.28% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.330%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 112 (57%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.9 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (32%)


| Technology | DAH | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 63 (32.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 59 (30.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 54 (27.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (10.2%) |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar, founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, and Yingli Solar, established in 1998 in Baoding, China, are both recognized as Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, yet they represent markedly different trajectories in the global PV market. Yingli was once a world top-10 module supplier, shipping over 24 GW of panels to more than 100 countries, but financial difficulties through the 2010s led to its delisting from the NYSE - it now trades on the OTC Pink market and reports a current production capacity of 2.45 GW with a workforce of over 9,000 employees. DAH Solar, despite being the younger company by 11 years, has expanded aggressively and maintained its BNEF Tier 1 status through Q3 2025, positioning itself as a high-volume N-type focused supplier with a substantially larger manufacturing footprint and a broader panel catalog of 356 products versus Yingli's 196.

The technology gap between the two manufacturers is material and consequential for project selection. DAH Solar's portfolio is dominated by N-type TOPCon cells, which account for over 81% of its lineup, delivering an average module efficiency of 22.13%, a maximum of 23.34%, and an average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C - a figure that translates to meaningfully lower power losses during peak summer irradiance. Its bifacial ratio of 88.76% and average warranty term of 29.5 years make DAH a strong candidate for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bifacial energy gain and long-term performance guarantees drive project economics. Yingli's lineup is led by PERC technology at 32% of its portfolio, with a less favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.330%/°C and a bifacial ratio of 57.14%. However, Yingli's premium Panda N-type bifacial modules reach a maximum efficiency of 24.1% and a peak output of 735 Wp, making them competitive for space-constrained residential rooftop installs where maximizing output per square meter is the defining constraint.

For international buyers weighing the two, DAH Solar offers a more technologically cohesive supply chain and a broadly superior average performance profile across efficiency, temperature behavior, bifacial coverage, and warranty depth - making it the more versatile choice for utility-scale procurement, C&I rollouts, and volume residential programs. Yingli remains a credible option, particularly in its Panda premium segment, for buyers seeking the highest peak wattage per module or those with established commercial relationships, though its smaller production scale and financial history warrant careful due diligence on long-term supply continuity before committing to large-volume contracts.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [DAH vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [DAH vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-yingli