---
title: "DAH vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-trina-solar"
---

# DAH vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.dahsolarpv.com](https://www.dahsolarpv.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | DAH | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Trina Solar are both China-headquartered, Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Trina Solar, founded in 1997, is one of the world's top three module manufacturers with annual shipments of approximately 77 GW and a production capacity targeting over 100 GW - giving it a global market share of around 11%. DAH Solar, founded in 2009, is a significantly smaller but rapidly growing manufacturer with module production capacity in the range of 5-10 GW, increasingly recognised for its specialisation in high-efficiency bifacial TOPCon products. Both hold Tier 1 bankable status, making them financeable for large-scale projects, though Trina Solar's longer track record and global distribution network give it a stronger institutional footprint.

On the technology side, DAH Solar's portfolio is more thoroughly concentrated in TOPCon cells at 81.18% of its lineup, compared to 69.84% for Trina Solar. DAH Solar achieves a higher average module power of 521.8 Wp and a better average efficiency of 22.13%, while its temperature coefficient of -0.2976%/°C is more favourable than Trina's -0.3038%/°C, translating into better summer yield in hot climates. Trina Solar leads in peak specifications, however, with a maximum module power of 740 Wp and a top efficiency of 24.1%, and it holds a perfect score in PVEL third-party testing - a strong indicator of reliability. The most striking portfolio difference is in bifaciality: 88.76% of DAH Solar's panels are bifacial, versus only 39.02% for Trina Solar, making DAH Solar the more natural choice for ground-mount, flat-roof, and utility-scale installations where rear-side irradiance can be captured. DAH Solar also offers a longer average product warranty at 29.5 years compared to Trina's 28.15 years.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the choice largely depends on project scale and risk tolerance. Trina Solar is the lower-risk option for large commercial C&I and utility-scale projects where supply chain certainty, bankability, and a globally recognised brand are critical. DAH Solar presents a compelling case for buyers prioritising bifacial technology, a slightly superior average efficiency-per-watt across the portfolio, and a longer warranty commitment - particularly for residential rooftop installs and mid-scale ground-mount projects where bifacial gain adds measurable value.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [DAH vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [DAH vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-trina-solar