---
title: "DAH vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# DAH vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.dahsolarpv.com](https://www.dahsolarpv.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | DAH | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Jinko Solar are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable PV module manufacturers, yet they differ substantially in scale, market positioning, and corporate profile. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, ranks among the world's largest solar panel producers with a stated production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,000 employees, and shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange - giving it a level of financial transparency and institutional credibility that few module manufacturers can match. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Hefei, China, operates at a considerably smaller module scale estimated at around 10 GW, but has rapidly built an international footprint spanning over 120 countries, with Europe and Latin America as its primary export markets. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status confirmed by BloombergNEF, establishing a baseline of financial reliability required for most project finance structures.

On the technology side, both companies have adopted N-type TOPCon cells as their primary platform, but their portfolio compositions diverge meaningfully. DAH Solar has built its catalog around bifacial modules, with 88.8% of its 356-panel lineup being bifacial - a clear strategic focus on maximizing energy yield per unit area. Its patented Full-Screen module technology, protected across 18 countries, reportedly delivers up to 11.5% higher energy generation versus conventional framed modules. DAH's average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C also edges out Jinko's -0.308%/°C, translating to better real-world output in warm climates. These characteristics make DAH a particularly strong technical fit for utility-scale ground-mount systems with reflective ground surfaces and commercial C&I flat-roof projects on white membrane substrates. Jinko Solar covers a broader catalog of 545 panels, reaching a higher peak efficiency of 24.8% and a maximum panel power of 735 Wp. Only 31.9% of its portfolio is bifacial, with a larger share of monofacial options well-suited to cost-sensitive residential rooftop installations. Jinko has earned PVEL "Top Performer" status for eleven consecutive years from 2015 to 2025, a robust independent signal of long-term module reliability. Average warranty terms favor DAH slightly at 29.5 years versus Jinko's 28.5 years, both above typical industry norms.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision turns largely on project type and procurement priorities. DAH Solar is the stronger technical proposition for projects where bifacial energy gain and low temperature losses are critical performance drivers - notably utility-scale ground-mount and commercial flat-roof C&I installations. Jinko Solar's massive production scale, globally diversified manufacturing base, NYSE listing, and decade-long independent reliability track record make it the lower-risk institutional choice for large-volume procurement and project finance structures where brand bankability carries weight with lenders and equity partners.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [DAH vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [DAH vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-vs-jinko-solar