---
title: "DAH Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-znshine"
---

# DAH Solar vs ZNShine

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 212 models). DAH Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Suqian |
| Founded | 2009 | 1988 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | null | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 212 | +151 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 670 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 535 W | +14 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 22.83% | +0.51 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.35% | +0.76 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 89 (42%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 134 (63.2%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and ZNShine are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers with identical stated production capacities of 10 GW, yet they differ considerably in age, technology focus, and global profile. DAH Solar was founded in 2009 and has grown to over 2,000 employees, establishing itself primarily in the European and Latin American markets with distribution to more than 120 countries. It has maintained its position on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list through Q1 2025. ZNShine has deeper roots, tracing its origins to 1988 and its entry into photovoltaics to 2006, with a workforce of around 1,200 employees and a listing on China's NEEQ exchange. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankable status, making them viable for project finance, though DAH Solar currently holds a higher international profile and broader installer recognition.

On the technology side, DAH Solar has made a decisive pivot toward TOPCon, which accounts for 79.6% of its 363-panel catalogue. This is reflected in a maximum module power of 725 Wp, a maximum efficiency of 23.34%, and an average portfolio efficiency of 22.1%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C is notably favorable, and 87% of its panels are bifacial - making it a strong choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and high-density residential rooftop installs where every watt per square meter counts. ZNShine's portfolio still leans on PERC technology (63.2% of 212 panels), with a maximum power of 670 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 22.83%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.329%/°C is less favorable under high-heat conditions, and bifacial coverage stands at 42%. ZNShine does differentiate itself with graphene-coated glass and double-glass constructions, which add durability and self-cleaning properties suited to commercial C&I installations or large solar farms in dusty environments.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar's advantage lies in its higher efficiency ceiling, broader bifacial portfolio, and more modern cell technology - attributes that maximize energy yield in space-constrained or performance-critical projects. ZNShine offers a credible Tier 1 alternative with a long operating history and competitive pricing, and its PERC-based products may suit buyers where budget is the primary constraint and the performance premium of TOPCon does not justify the cost difference. DAH Solar's average product warranty of 29.4 years also edges out ZNShine's 28.3 years, adding a marginal long-term assurance advantage.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.