---
title: "DAH Solar vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-yingli"
---

# DAH Solar vs Yingli

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 196 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 2009 | 1998 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | null | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 196 | +167 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 735 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 524 W | +4 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 24.10% | +0.76 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.28% | +0.83 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 112 (57%) | +30 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +1.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 54 (27.6%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 63 (32.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 59 (30.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (10.2%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Yingli are both Chinese Tier 1 solar module manufacturers, but they differ substantially in trajectory, scale, and technology maturity. DAH Solar, founded in 2009, has grown rapidly to a production capacity of 10 GW and distributes its products to more than 120 countries, with Europe and Latin America as key markets - it secured its place on the BNEF Q1 2025 Tier 1 list and employs over 2,000 people. Yingli, founded in 1998 and once among the world's largest module makers with cumulative shipments exceeding 24 GW, went through severe financial distress and judicial restructuring in the mid-2010s; today it retains Tier 1 bankability but operates at a substantially reduced production capacity of 2.45 GW and its shares trade on the OTC Pink market following delisting from the NYSE. The contrast in company health is a critical differentiator for buyers evaluating long-term warranty security.

Technologically, DAH Solar has committed decisively to n-type TOPCon, which accounts for 79.61% of its portfolio, and 87% of its panels are bifacial - a combination that delivers an average module efficiency of 22.10% and a notably favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C, along with an average product warranty of 29.4 years. This makes DAH Solar a strong choice for residential rooftop installations, commercial C&I projects, and ground-mount systems where consistent energy yield under variable temperatures matters. Yingli's portfolio is still dominated by PERC technology (32.14%), with TOPCon adoption growing but not yet dominant; average efficiency stands at 21.28% with a higher temperature coefficient of -0.330%/°C and 57% bifacial coverage. Yingli's peak power output reaches 735 Wp, marginally higher than DAH Solar's 725 Wp, which may appeal to utility-scale buyers seeking high-density installations.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar currently presents the more technically consistent and financially stable proposition - its modern TOPCon-dominant lineup, higher average efficiency, better thermal performance, and longer average warranty make it suitable for both residential and commercial buyers who prioritize reliability. Yingli remains a viable option in cost-sensitive or large-scale procurement scenarios, but prospective buyers should conduct thorough due diligence on its financial standing and supply chain continuity before committing to a long-term sourcing agreement.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.