---
title: "DAH Solar vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-waaree"
---

# DAH Solar vs Waaree

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 222 models). Waaree leads on peak efficiency at 23.51%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Mumbai |
| Founded | 2009 | 1990 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 8500+ |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 13.3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE: WAAREEENER |
| Website | null | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 222 | +141 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 371 W | +149 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.51% | +0.17 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 18.39% | +3.71 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.063 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 85 (38%) | +49 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +7.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 139 (62.6%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 47 (21.2%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 14 (6.3%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 13 (5.9%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 9 (4.1%) |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 124 (55.9%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 35 (15.8%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 36 (16.2%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 20 (9.0%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 7 (3.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 12 (5.4%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 107 (48.2%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 88 (39.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 8 (3.6%) |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Waaree


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Hefei, China, is a dedicated solar module manufacturer with 10 GW of production capacity and a portfolio of 363 panels. Waaree is part of the Waaree Group, established in India in 1990 and based in Mumbai, with over 8,500 employees, 13.3 GW of manufacturing capacity, and a listing on the NSE stock exchange. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankable status, which qualifies them for project finance. DAH Solar has an established footprint in Europe - the company showcased its modules at the Solar Energy Expo Poland in January 2025 and maintains a local support network there - while Waaree is actively pursuing European expansion under the EU Net-Zero Industry Act framework, with a strategic focus on Eastern European markets from 2026 onward.

The technology gap between the two manufacturers is substantial. DAH Solar's portfolio is anchored by TOPCon cells, which account for 79.6% of its lineup, yielding an average module efficiency of 22.1% and an average power output of 520 Wp - well above Waaree's portfolio average of 362 Wp and 18.2% efficiency. DAH Solar's bifacial share stands at 87% versus 36% for Waaree, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C compares favorably against Waaree's -0.364%/°C, meaning lower performance losses during peak summer irradiance. DAH Solar also offers an average warranty of 29.4 years against 21.4 years for Waaree. Waaree's peak module power of 730 Wp and peak efficiency of 23.5% marginally exceed DAH Solar's respective figures of 725 Wp and 23.34%, reflecting select premium products in its lineup. DAH Solar's portfolio suits high-efficiency residential rooftop installs and bifacial ground-mount systems, while Waaree's broader range - built primarily on PERC technology - covers segments from small commercial C&I projects to utility-scale deployments, with the added appeal of a non-Chinese supply chain.

For international buyers comparing the two, DAH Solar holds a clear technical advantage in average efficiency, bifacial share, temperature performance, and warranty depth. Waaree's competitive proposition rests on its larger manufacturing scale, its publicly listed and auditable corporate structure, and its supply chain origin outside China - factors that are growing in relevance under EU NZIA procurement rules and diversification strategies adopted by European developers. Buyers optimizing for module performance metrics will favor DAH Solar, while those prioritizing supply chain resilience or regulatory compliance will find Waaree's positioning increasingly compelling.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-waaree

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.