---
title: "DAH Solar vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-sunova"
---

# DAH Solar vs Sunova

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 183 models). DAH Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Hefei |
| Founded | 2009 | 2008 |
| Employees | 2000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | null | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 183 | +180 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 720 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 523 W | +3 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.20% | +0.14 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.60% | +0.51 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 168 (92%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 46 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 70 (38.3%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 57 (31.1%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Power distribution

Sunova offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 84 (45.9%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 58 (31.7%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 31 (16.9%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 12 (6.6%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 89 (48.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 72 (39.3%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 10 (5.5%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar was founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, and has grown into a substantial global PV manufacturer with more than 2,000 employees and a production capacity of 10 GW. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status according to BloombergNEF - confirmed as recently as Q1 2025 - which signals financial stability and broad market acceptance among project financiers and investors. Sunova Solar Technology, founded one year earlier in 2008 and also headquartered in China, does not currently hold Tier 1 bankable status. With a product portfolio of 183 panel models compared to DAH Solar's 363, Sunova occupies a more modest footprint in global markets, though the company has been actively investing in new cell manufacturing capacity, including a planned 9 GW TOPCon cell plant, and maintains module assembly operations in both China and Vietnam.

DAH Solar's portfolio is strongly oriented toward TOPCon cell technology, which accounts for nearly 80% of its lineup. The company is also recognized for its patented Full-Screen frameless double-glass module design, which reduces inactive panel surface area and limits dust accumulation. Average panel efficiency stands at 22.1%, reaching a maximum of 23.34%, with a top power output of 725 Wp. The average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C and average product warranty of 29.4 years are both favorable indicators for long-term field performance. DAH Solar's combination of Tier 1 status, broad portfolio, and consistent efficiency leadership makes it well suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and utility-scale ground mounts where bankability is a project finance requirement. Sunova, by contrast, still relies on PERC technology for approximately 49% of its portfolio, placing it behind in the current industry-wide transition to higher-efficiency architectures. Its average efficiency of 21.6% and temperature coefficient of -0.317%/°C are slightly less competitive, though the company's maximum module power of 720 Wp remains solid. Sunova's standout metric is its high bifacial portfolio share of 91.8%, which can deliver meaningful energy yield gains in ground-mounted installations with reflective surfaces.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar presents the stronger overall case: Tier 1 bankability reduces financing friction on larger projects, higher average efficiency delivers better output per unit of roof or land area, and the more favorable temperature coefficient translates to better real-world performance in variable climates. Sunova may appeal in cost-sensitive utility-scale or ground-mount projects where its high bifacial ratio adds yield value and where Tier 1 status is not a hard financing requirement - but buyers should be aware that its technology portfolio is still in transition away from PERC, and the absence from Tier 1 rankings can be a limiting factor for bank-financed projects.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunova)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunova)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-sunova

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.