---
title: "DAH Solar vs Sunlike Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Sunlike Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-sunlike-solar"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/dah-solar/sunlike-solar.png"
---

# DAH Solar vs Sunlike Solar

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 135 models). Sunlike Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Wuxi, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 300 |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | null | [http://www.sunlikesolar.com](http://www.sunlikesolar.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Sunlike Solar Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise specializing in researching, developing, designing, and producing new energy and renewable energy products. They offer various high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells and solar modules ranging from 200W to 750W. Their production capacity has...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 135 | +228 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 675 W | +50 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 493 W | +28 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.52% | +0.18 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.19% | +0.91 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.328%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 57 (42%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 27.2 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 16 (11.9%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 41 (30.4%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 36 (26.7%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 35 (25.9%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 7 (5.2%) |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 16 (11.9%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 67 (49.6%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 26 (19.3%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 26 (19.3%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (88%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 18 (13.3%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 51 (37.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 30 (22.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 27 (20.0%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (3.7%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 4 (3.0%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunlike Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LNET-675M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-675m) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LNET-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LNET-670MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670md) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LNET-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665m) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LNET-665MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665md) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LNET-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660m) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LNET-660MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660md) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LNET-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655m) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LNET-655MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655md) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LNET-650MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-650md) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Sunlike Solar are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy very different tiers of the global solar market. DAH Solar was founded in 2009 and has grown to employ over 2,000 people, with a production capacity of 10 GW. The company holds BNEF Tier 1 bankable status, confirmed continuously throughout 2025 including both Q1 and Q4, and distributes its products to over 120 countries with Europe and Latin America as primary markets. Sunlike Solar, founded one year later in 2010, is a considerably smaller operation with approximately 300 employees and a production capacity of 2 GW, and does not hold Tier 1 status. This scale difference is directly reflected in their technology portfolios: DAH Solar has transitioned nearly 80% of its lineup to TOPCon cell technology, while Sunlike Solar's largest cell technology segment remains PERC at 37.8% of its portfolio - a technology that is increasingly viewed as a prior generation standard.

DAH Solar's portfolio of 363 panels shows an average module power of 520 Wp, a maximum of 725 Wp, and an average efficiency of 22.1%, backed by a strong average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C and an industry-leading bifaciality rate of 87%. An average product warranty of 29.4 years further strengthens its appeal for utility-scale ground-mount projects and commercial C&I installations where long-term bankability and yield predictability are critical. Sunlike Solar's 135-panel portfolio reaches a maximum efficiency of 23.52% - fractionally above DAH Solar's maximum of 23.34% - but its average efficiency of 21.2%, weaker temperature coefficient of -0.328%/°C, bifaciality rate of only 42.2%, and shorter average warranty of 27.2 years make it a more modest option, best suited for cost-sensitive residential rooftop installs where financing guarantees are less of a concern.

For international buyers comparing these two manufacturers, DAH Solar is the stronger choice across virtually all project types - offering greater technology maturity, superior bifacial penetration, a higher-power portfolio, better thermal performance, and the financial security of Tier 1 bankability. Sunlike Solar may appeal to buyers in price-sensitive segments or smaller-scale deployments, but should be evaluated carefully where project financing or long-term performance guarantees are priorities.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunlike-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunlike-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunlike-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-sunlike-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.