---
title: "DAH Solar vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-seraphim"
---

# DAH Solar vs Seraphim

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 160 models). Seraphim leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | null | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 160 | +203 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 549 W | +29 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.50% | +0.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.82% | +0.28 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 111 (69%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 11 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 66 (41.2%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 4 (2.5%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar, founded in China in 2009, and Seraphim, also Chinese and established in 2011, are both Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturers competing across global solar PV markets. DAH Solar operates with a production capacity of 10 GW and maintains a broad portfolio of 363 panel models, distributed to over 120 countries, with a particularly active European presence built around a logistics warehouse in Rotterdam and a branch office in Frankfurt - with documented market activity in Germany, Austria, Italy, and Poland. Seraphim holds a larger production capacity of 13 GW and carries 11 consecutive years of BNEF Tier 1 recognition, reflecting consistent financial credibility. Its key European markets include Germany, Spain, and Turkey, where the company has executed substantial projects and built solid brand recognition since 2019.

On the technology side, DAH Solar is distinguished by its patented Full-Screen module - a frameless front-side design validated by TüV Nord to reduce soiling accumulation and improve energy yield relative to conventional framed modules. Its portfolio leans heavily toward TOPCon at 79.6% of models, delivering an average panel efficiency of 22.1% and a peak of 23.34%. With 87.1% of its modules being bifacial, DAH Solar is particularly well-suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bifacial gain adds measurable value. Its temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C per Pmax is slightly more favorable than Seraphim's -0.312%/°C, an advantage in warmer climates. Seraphim counters with a higher maximum power output of 730 Wp and a marginally higher peak efficiency of 23.5%, plus a higher average panel power of 550.8 Wp versus DAH Solar's 520.3 Wp - an advantage in high-density rooftop installations. However, Seraphim's TOPCon penetration stands at only 48.5% of its catalog, and the brand has faced documented warranty service concerns in certain markets, including the revocation of a recommended-supplier status in Australia in April 2023.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar offers a more technologically uniform portfolio - particularly for projects requiring high bifaciality, low temperature sensitivity, and strong European logistics support, with average warranties of 29.4 years. Seraphim's greater production scale and higher peak power figures make it a competitive option for large procurement volumes in utility-scale tenders, but buyers should carefully verify local warranty support infrastructure before committing. Average warranties are broadly comparable at approximately 29 years for both manufacturers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.