---
title: "DAH Solar vs Phono Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Phono Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-phono-solar"
---

# DAH Solar vs Phono Solar

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 174 models). Phono Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Nanjing |
| Founded | 2009 | 2004 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 13000+ |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 3-4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | null | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 174 | +189 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 515 W | +5 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.50% | +0.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.77% | +0.33 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.306%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 74 (43%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 27.1 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 3 (1.7%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 37 (21.3%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 62 (35.6%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 19 (10.9%) |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 10 (5.7%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 78 (44.8%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 51 (29.3%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 23 (13.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 12 (6.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 65 (37.4%) |
| N-type | 0 | 50 (28.7%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (2.9%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 1 (0.6%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and Phono Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers holding Tier 1 bankable status according to BloombergNEF, yet they differ considerably in scale, technology direction, and market positioning. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Hefei, China, operates with a production capacity of 10 GW and a workforce of over 2,000 employees. It distributes products to more than 120 countries, with Europe and Latin America as primary markets, and has confirmed its Tier 1 status through Q1 2025 BNEF rankings. Phono Solar, established earlier in 2004, employs over 13,000 people but operates at a smaller production scale of 3-4 GW. Both manufacturers serve global markets, though Phono Solar has historically focused more on established markets such as Europe and Australia, where it has been present since 2010, and was named a Top Performer in the Kiwa PVEL 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard.

On the technology side, DAH Solar has made a decisive shift toward TOPCon, which accounts for nearly 80% of its 363-model portfolio. This translates into a strong average module efficiency of 22.1%, a favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C, and a bifacial share of 87% - making it well suited for residential rooftop installations seeking year-round yield optimization, as well as utility-scale ground-mount projects and commercial C&I applications where bifacial gain matters. Phono Solar's portfolio of 173 models is still led by PERC technology at around 38%, though it reaches a higher peak panel efficiency of 23.5% and a maximum output of 730 Wp. Its lower bifacial penetration at 42% and a shorter average warranty of 27.1 years versus DAH Solar's 29.4 years suggest a more conservative product strategy, though its independently verified reliability makes it a credible choice for commercial rooftop and industrial projects where long-term module durability is the primary concern.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar offers a more future-oriented technology portfolio with a broader product range, higher bifacial adoption, and a longer average warranty - advantages that favor projects optimizing for energy yield and bankability over a long asset life. Phono Solar is a dependable alternative for buyers who prioritize independently verified reliability and an established track record, particularly in markets where the PVEL scorecard recognition carries weight with lenders and asset managers.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-phono-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-phono-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-phono-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-phono-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.