---
title: "DAH Solar vs MY Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs MY Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-my-solar"
---

# DAH Solar vs MY Solar

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 140 models). MY Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | MY Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Hefei |  |
| Founded | 2009 |  |
| Employees | 2000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | null |  |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | MY Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 140 | +223 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 740 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 418 W | +103 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | MY Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.82% | +0.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 19.87% | +2.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | MY Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.333%/°C | +0.034 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 54 (39%) | +48 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 27.1 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | MY Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 75 (53.6%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 10 (7.1%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 19 (13.6%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 30 (21.4%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 6 (4.3%) |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | MY Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 66 (47.1%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 35 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 10 (7.1%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 18 (12.9%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 11 (7.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (58%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | MY Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 25 (17.9%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 81 (57.9%) |
| HJT | 0 | 29 (20.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 5 (3.6%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, MY Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MS740N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms740n-hjtgb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MS735N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms735n-hjtgb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MS730N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms730n-hjtgb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MS725N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms725n-hjtgb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MS720N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms720n-hjtgb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MS715N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms715n-hjtgb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MS710N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms710n-hjtgb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MS705N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms705n-hjtgb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MY-M12/144-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-my-m12-144-700) | 700 | 22.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MS700N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms700n-dhbg) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar and MY Solar represent two significantly different tiers of the solar PV manufacturing market. DAH Solar, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Hefei, China, is an established manufacturer with over 2,000 employees and a production capacity of 10 GW. The company holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status according to the Bloomberg NEF Q1 2025 list, making it eligible for project financing from institutional lenders. MY Solar, by contrast, is a smaller manufacturer with no disclosed founding year, employee count, or production capacity figures, and does not carry Tier 1 bankable status - a meaningful distinction for buyers who require third-party credit assurance or project finance.

On the technology side, DAH Solar's portfolio of 363 models is dominated by TOPCon cells (79.6% of models), delivering an average module efficiency of 22.1%, an average power output of 520.3 Wp, and an average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C. Some 87% of its lineup is bifacial, making it well suited to utility-scale ground-mount projects where albedo gain is relevant, as well as to commercial C&I and residential rooftop applications where high efficiency per square meter matters. The company also holds a patent on Full-Screen frameless module design, which reduces soiling accumulation. MY Solar's portfolio of 140 models is primarily PERC-based (57.9%), with an average efficiency of 19.87%, an average output of 417.7 Wp, and a less favorable temperature coefficient of -0.333%/°C. While MY Solar lists a peak panel at 740 Wp and 23.82% maximum efficiency - slightly ahead of DAH Solar's best - these are isolated portfolio peaks; the overall portfolio average is substantially lower. MY Solar's bifacial share stands at only 38.6%, and its average warranty period of 27.1 years trails DAH Solar's 29.4 years.

For international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar offers a clearly stronger proposition across most dimensions: Tier 1 bankability, higher average efficiency, a better temperature coefficient, a predominantly TOPCon and bifacial lineup, and longer warranty terms. MY Solar may serve cost-sensitive off-grid or small-scale applications where bankability requirements are absent, but for any project requiring lender approval, long-term yield assurance, or grid-scale deployment, DAH Solar is the more credible choice.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MY Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-my-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs MY Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-my-solar)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs MY Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-my-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-my-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.