---
title: "DAH Solar vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare DAH Solar vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-hyundai"
---

# DAH Solar vs Hyundai

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 65 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | DAH Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2009 | 2004 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 10 GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | null | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | DAH Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 363 | 65 | +298 |
| Max Power | 725 W | 640 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 442 W | +78 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | DAH Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.34% | 23.40% | +0.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.10% | 21.49% | +0.61 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | DAH Solar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 316 (87%) | 43 (66%) | +21 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | DAH Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 10 (2.8%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 22 (6.1%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 86 (23.7%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 217 (59.8%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 28 (7.7%) | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | DAH Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (2.2%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 161 (44.4%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 113 (31.1%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 71 (19.6%) | 3 (4.6%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (2.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | DAH Solar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 319 (87.9%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| PERC | 44 (12.1%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |


## Top panels, DAH Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

DAH Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Hefei, Anhui Province, founded in 2009 and now operating six production bases with a combined nameplate capacity that the company reports at around 20 GW. The company has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV module list continuously from Q2 2024 through Q4 2025, confirming institutional bankability across multiple successive quarters. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer that organized its solar business in 2004 as part of the Hyundai Heavy Industries conglomerate, now operating under the HD Hyundai group umbrella. Hyundai Energy Solutions also holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and was named a PVEL top performer in 2025 reliability testing - an independent certification that carries weight with risk-sensitive project finance teams. In terms of raw institutional footprint, DAH Solar's larger production scale gives it an edge in supply-chain resilience on large projects, while Hyundai's Korean provenance provides a credibility advantage in markets sensitive to country of origin.

DAH Solar's product line is anchored by its proprietary Full-Screen PV Module format, and the company has built substantial TOPCon manufacturing capacity - reportedly around 10 GW annually for TOPCon modules alone. Its catalog spans residential rooftops, commercial and industrial rooftops, and utility-scale ground-mounted arrays. Hyundai Energy Solutions offers a comparably broad power range, running from compact residential modules starting around 350 W up to bifacial commercial panels at 640 W. Search results confirm that Hyundai's current lineup uses both PERC and N-type TOPCon cell technology, with the bifacial TOPCon panels achieving module efficiencies up to approximately 22.9%. Hyundai's R&D center holds accredited laboratory status from both UL and VDE, which shortens the certification path for new products and underpins a warranty offering that extends to 30 years on selected lines.

For most international buyers choosing between the two, DAH Solar represents a stronger proposition at utility and large C&I scale, given its higher production volume, consistent Tier 1 track record, and deep TOPCon product depth. Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more defensible choice for buyers in markets where Korean brand heritage carries procurement weight, or where a 30-year product and performance warranty is a contractual requirement. Neither brand is a compromise: both are Tier 1 bankable and have demonstrated long-term reliability in independent testing, so at comparable price points the decision often comes down to local availability and specific project warranty terms.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [DAH Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [DAH Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [DAH Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/dah-solar-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.