--- title: "ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-630" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630 Identical on every published parameter All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625) | [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm7-uh156-630) | | Manufacturer | ZNShine | ZNShine | | Power | 625 Wp | 630 Wp | | Efficiency | 22.36 % | 22.54 % | | Technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 625 | 630 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 625 Wp | 630 Wp | | Module efficiency | 22.36 % | 22.54 % | | Power density | 223.6 Wp/m² | 225.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 55.80 V | 56.00 V | | Voltage at max power | 46.20 V | 46.40 V | | Short-circuit current | 14.31 A | 14.37 A | | Current at max power | 13.53 A | 13.58 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.300 %/°C | -0.300 %/°C | | Dimensions | 2465x1134x35 mm | 2465x1134x35 mm | | Module area | 2.795 m² | 2.795 m² | | Weight | 30.0 kg | 30.0 kg | | Weight per kWp | 48.0 kg/kWp | 47.6 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.50 %/yr | 0.50 %/yr | | Cell technology | TOPCon | TOPCon | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 156 | 156 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 625:** 20,644 kWh - **Cumulative output, 630:** 20,809 kWh - **Gap:** 165 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 625 | 630 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 625 W | 630 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 597 W | 602 W | 95.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 569 W | 573 W | 91.0% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 541 W | 545 W | 86.5% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 625 | 630 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #5,007 | #3,920 | 14,005 | 630 leads by 1,087 places | | Power density | #4,955 | #3,907 | 14,005 | 630 leads by 1,048 places | | Heat behaviour | #6,093 | #6,093 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #2,004 | #1,771 | 14,005 | 630 leads by 233 places | | Warranty | #9,798 | #9,798 | 14,005 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #4,035 | #3,639 | 14,005 | 630 leads by 396 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 or ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630? According to our database: **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630** has higher module efficiency (**22.54%** vs **22.36%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 and ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630? **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625** has a module efficiency of **22.36%**, while **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630** is **22.54%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 use vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630? **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625** uses **TOPCon** cells; **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630** uses **TOPCon**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 and ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630? **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625** has a **25 years** power warranty; **ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-630** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-620](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-620) - The same specification on paper - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-615](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-615) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-610](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-610) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-605](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-605) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-600](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-600) - 6 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [ZNShine ZXM7-UH156-625 vs ZNShine ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) - 15 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/znshine-zxm7-uh156-625/znshine-zxm7-uh156-630 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.