--- title: "Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-395 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-395 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification." source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-395" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-395.png" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-395 395 leads on the differences that matter The largest is module efficiency: 0.75 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical. ## The two panels | Attribute | A | B | | --- | --- | --- | | Panel | [Waaree WSM-380](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsm-380) | [Waaree WSM-395](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsm-395) | | Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree | | Power | 380 Wp | 395 Wp | | Efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.83 % | | Technology | PERC | PERC | ## Where they differ Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order. | Parameter | 380 | 395 | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.83 % | +0.75 pp for 395 | | Power density | 190.9 Wp/m² | 198.4 Wp/m² | +7.5 Wp/m² for 395 | | Rated power | 380 Wp | 395 Wp | +15 W for 395 | | Weight per kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | -2.1 kg/kWp for 395 | ## Every compared parameter | Parameter | 380 | 395 | | --- | --- | --- | | Rated power | 380 Wp | 395 Wp | | Module efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.83 % | | Power density | 190.9 Wp/m² | 198.4 Wp/m² | | Open-circuit voltage | 48.45 V | 49.05 V | | Voltage at max power | 39.70 V | 40.28 V | | Short-circuit current | 9.90 A | 10.12 A | | Current at max power | 9.58 A | 9.81 A | | Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.370 %/°C | | Dimensions | 1985x1003x35 mm | 1985x1003x35 mm | | Module area | 1.991 m² | 1.991 m² | | Weight | 21.5 kg | 21.5 kg | | Weight per kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | 54.4 kg/kWp | | Product warranty | 10 yrs | 10 yrs | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs | | Annual degradation | 0.70 %/yr | 0.70 %/yr | | Cell technology | PERC | PERC | | Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline | | Cell count | 72 | 72 | | Bifacial | No | No | ## Thirty-year yield Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other. - **Cumulative output, 380:** 11,881 kWh - **Cumulative output, 395:** 12,350 kWh - **Gap:** 469 kWh ## Output when hot | Condition | Cell temperature | 380 | 395 | Retained | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 380 W | 395 W | 100.0% of rated power | | Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 359 W | 373 W | 94.5% of rated power | | Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 338 W | 351 W | 88.9% of rated power | | Hot roof | 70 °C | 317 W | 329 W | 83.3% of rated power | ## Against the whole database | Measure | 380 | 395 | Out of | Note | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Efficiency | #13,013 | #12,497 | 14,129 | 395 leads by 516 places | | Power density | #12,990 | #12,472 | 14,129 | 395 leads by 518 places | | Heat behaviour | #13,161 | #13,161 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Weight | #10,813 | #8,811 | 14,129 | 395 leads by 2,002 places | | Warranty | #9,912 | #9,912 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database | | Overall | #12,943 | #12,611 | 14,129 | 395 leads by 332 places | ## Questions ### Which panel is better: Waaree WSM-380 or Waaree WSM-395? According to our database: **Waaree WSM-395** has higher module efficiency (**19.83%** vs **19.08%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture. ### What is the efficiency of Waaree WSM-380 and Waaree WSM-395? **Waaree WSM-380** has a module efficiency of **19.08%**, while **Waaree WSM-395** is **19.83%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited. ### What cell technology does Waaree WSM-380 use vs Waaree WSM-395? **Waaree WSM-380** uses **PERC** cells; **Waaree WSM-395** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells. ### What is the warranty on Waaree WSM-380 and Waaree WSM-395? **Waaree WSM-380** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Waaree WSM-395** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter. ## Related comparisons - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-390](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-390) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-385](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-385) - One difference: module efficiency - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-350](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-350) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-345](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-345) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-340](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-340) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency - [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-335](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-335) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency --- Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-395 Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.