---
title: "Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-385 - Solar Panel Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-385 side by side: what actually differs, output when it is hot, thirty-year production, and the full specification."
source: "https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-385"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/panels/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-385.png"
updated: 2026-09-11
---

# Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-385

385 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.25 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.


## The two panels


| Attribute | A | B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel | [Waaree WSM-380](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsm-380) | [Waaree WSM-385](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsm-385) |
| Manufacturer | Waaree | Waaree |
| Power | 380 Wp | 385 Wp |
| Efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.33 % |
| Technology | PERC | PERC |


## Where they differ

Ranked by how much the difference matters, not by datasheet order.


| Parameter | 380 | 385 | Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Module efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.33 % | +0.25 pp for 385 |


## Every compared parameter


| Parameter | 380 | 385 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rated power | 380 Wp | 385 Wp |
| Module efficiency | 19.08 % | 19.33 % |
| Power density | 190.9 Wp/m² | 193.4 Wp/m² |
| Open-circuit voltage | 48.45 V | 48.65 V |
| Voltage at max power | 39.70 V | 39.90 V |
| Short-circuit current | 9.90 A | 9.95 A |
| Current at max power | 9.58 A | 9.65 A |
| Temperature coefficient | -0.370 %/°C | -0.370 %/°C |
| Dimensions | 1985x1003x35 mm | 1985x1003x35 mm |
| Module area | 1.991 m² | 1.991 m² |
| Weight | 21.5 kg | 21.5 kg |
| Weight per kWp | 56.6 kg/kWp | 55.8 kg/kWp |
| Product warranty | 10 yrs | 10 yrs |
| Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 25 yrs |
| Annual degradation | 0.70 %/yr | 0.70 %/yr |
| Cell technology | PERC | PERC |
| Cell type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Cell count | 72 | 72 |
| Bifacial | No | No |


## Thirty-year yield

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

- **Cumulative output, 380:** 11,881 kWh
- **Cumulative output, 385:** 12,037 kWh
- **Gap:** 156 kWh


## Output when hot


| Condition | Cell temperature | 380 | 385 | Retained |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard test conditions | 25 °C | 380 W | 385 W | 100.0% of rated power |
| Cool, bright day | 40 °C | 359 W | 364 W | 94.5% of rated power |
| Typical summer roof | 55 °C | 338 W | 342 W | 88.9% of rated power |
| Hot roof | 70 °C | 317 W | 321 W | 83.3% of rated power |


## Against the whole database


| Measure | 380 | 385 | Out of | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Efficiency | #13,013 | #12,873 | 14,129 | 385 leads by 140 places |
| Power density | #12,990 | #12,854 | 14,129 | 385 leads by 136 places |
| Heat behaviour | #13,161 | #13,161 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Weight | #10,813 | #10,314 | 14,129 | 385 leads by 499 places |
| Warranty | #9,912 | #9,912 | 14,129 | Tied - the same position in the database |
| Overall | #12,943 | #12,857 | 14,129 | 385 leads by 86 places |


## Questions


### Which panel is better: Waaree WSM-380 or Waaree WSM-385?

According to our database: **Waaree WSM-385** has higher module efficiency (**19.33%** vs **19.08%**). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.


### What is the efficiency of Waaree WSM-380 and Waaree WSM-385?

**Waaree WSM-380** has a module efficiency of **19.08%**, while **Waaree WSM-385** is **19.33%**. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.


### What cell technology does Waaree WSM-380 use vs Waaree WSM-385?

**Waaree WSM-380** uses **PERC** cells; **Waaree WSM-385** uses **PERC**. Modern **n-type** technologies (**TOPCon**, **HJT**, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older **PERC** (p-type) cells.


### What is the warranty on Waaree WSM-380 and Waaree WSM-385?

**Waaree WSM-380** has a **25 years** power warranty; **Waaree WSM-385** has a **25 years** power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80**-87%**). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.


## Related comparisons

- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-395](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-395) - 4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WSM-390](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-390) - 3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-350](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-350) - 8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-345](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-345) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-340](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-340) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
- [Waaree WSM-380 vs Waaree WS-335](https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-ws-335) - 10 differences, the largest is module efficiency


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/compare/waaree-wsm-380/waaree-wsm-385

Not in this file, on the page: the thirty-year yield curve year by year at a cell temperature you pick and a written summary generated on request.

